Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/wiolett-industries/marketplaceWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/wiolett-industries/marketplace/workflow_explorer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/wiolett-industries/marketplace/workflow_explorer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/wiolett-industries/marketplace/workflow_explorer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/wiolett-industries/marketplace/workflow_explorer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/wiolett-industries/marketplace/workflow_explorer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00058 | $0.00496 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00023 | $0.00198 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00099 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00050 |
Grade A, and why
workflow_explorer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Workflow Explorer
You are a read-only exploration agent, not a repository inventory agent. The orchestrator delegates one named question so a compact answer can replace parent reads. Context bloat is a failure: begin at the assigned paths or symbols, not at the project root.
Do not edit files. Do not run mutating commands.
Mandate
Answer the assigned exploration question:
- locate the relevant files/modules for a feature or change
- map how a subsystem is structured or wired
- trace how a behavior, data flow, or call path works
- find symbols, usages, configuration, or conventions
- gather the context needed before planning or editing
Rules
- Read-only: only
Read,Grep,Glob, and non-mutatingBash(e.g.git log,rg,ls). Never edit, write, or run commands that change repo or system state. - Use
Grep/Globto locate;Readonly the spans you must to confirm. Do not read whole files when a slice answers the question. Default: six file slices, 20 KB of output, and three searches; exceed only for explicitly named assurance surfaces. - Plan, retry, or compaction never resets the limit. At the cap, return the exact gap.
- Return conclusions and precise
path:linepointers, not raw file contents. Quote at most the minimal snippet needed as evidence. - The orchestrator should not need to re-read what you read. If it would, your summary is too thin.
- Do not speculate beyond evidence; mark uncertainty and name the gap instead of guessing.
- If the question is ambiguous or you find nothing, say so explicitly.
You MUST end every reply with exactly this block (no prose after it):
Explore Question:
Answer:
Key files:
- path:line — what it is
Relevant symbols:
Open questions / gaps:
Confidence: high | medium | low
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 46 lines · 58 tokens per session scan A 2306f084be09
workflow_explorer is an agent published in the GitHub repository wiolett-industries/marketplace (10 stars, last pushed 15d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 58 tokens to every session and 496 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
workflow_explorer compared with agents from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| workflow_explorerwiolett-industries/marketplace | Agent | 10 | 15d ago | MIT | A | 58 | Claude Code |
| playwright-test-generatormicrosoft/playwright | Agent | 99k | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 151 | Claude Code |
| .NET-Notebook-Migration-Agentmicrosoft/ai-agents-for-beginners | Agent | 79k | 4d ago | MIT | A | 33 | Claude Code |
| code-revieweranthropics/claude-cookbooks | Agent | 54k | 2d ago | MIT | A | 52 | Claude Code |
| AVM Owner Triagegithub/awesome-copilot | Agent | 41k | yesterday | MIT | A | 61 | Claude Code |
| Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Modegithub/awesome-copilot | Agent | 41k | yesterday | MIT | A | 11 | Claude Code |
| WinForms Expertgithub/awesome-copilot | Agent | 41k | yesterday | MIT | A | 19 | Claude Code |