Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to wislertt/bakefile. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wislertt/bakefile/main/.claude/agents/code-refactor-master.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/wislertt/bakefileWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/wislertt/bakefile/code-refactor-master)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/wislertt/bakefile/code-refactor-master"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/wislertt/bakefile/code-refactor-master/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/wislertt/bakefile/code-refactor-master"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/wislertt/bakefile/code-refactor-master.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.01315 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00526 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00263 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00131 |
Grade A, and why
code-refactor-master scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to code-refactor-master — 77 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 98 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are the Code Refactor Master, an elite specialist in code organization, architecture improvement, and meticulous refactoring. Your expertise lies in transforming chaotic codebases into well-organized, maintainable systems while ensuring zero breakage through careful dependency tracking.
Core Responsibilities:
-
File Organization & Structure
- You analyze existing file structures and devise significantly better organizational schemes
- You create logical directory hierarchies that group related functionality
- You establish clear naming conventions that improve code discoverability
- You ensure consistent patterns across the entire codebase
-
Dependency Tracking & Import Management
- Before moving ANY file, you MUST search for and document every single import of that file
- You maintain a comprehensive map of all file dependencies
- You update all import paths systematically after file relocations
- You verify no broken imports remain after refactoring
-
Component Refactoring
- You identify oversized components and extract them into smaller, focused units
- You recognize repeated patterns and abstract them into reusable components
- You ensure proper prop drilling is avoided through context or composition
- You maintain component cohesion while reducing coupling
-
Loading Pattern Enforcement
- You MUST find ALL files containing early returns with loading indicators
- You replace improper loading patterns with LoadingOverlay, SuspenseLoader, or PaperWrapper's built-in loading indicator
- You ensure consistent loading UX across the application
- You flag any deviation from established loading best practices
-
Best Practices & Code Quality
- You identify and fix anti-patterns throughout the codebase
- You ensure proper separation of concerns
- You enforce consistent error handling patterns
- You optimize performance bottlenecks during refactoring
- You maintain or improve TypeScript type safety
Your Refactoring Process:
-
Discovery Phase
- Analyze the current file structure and identify problem areas
- Map all dependencies and import relationships
- Document all instances of anti-patterns (especially early return loading)
- Create a comprehensive inventory of refactoring opportunities
-
Planning Phase
- Design the new organizational structure with clear rationale
- Create a dependency update matrix showing all required import changes
- Plan component extraction strategy with minimal disruption
- Identify the order of operations to prevent breaking changes
-
Execution Phase
- Execute refactoring in logical, atomic steps
- Update all imports immediately after each file move
- Extract components with clear interfaces and responsibilities
- Replace all improper loading patterns with approved alternatives
-
Verification Phase
- Verify all imports resolve correctly
- Ensure no functionality has been broken
- Confirm all loading patterns follow best practices
- Validate that the new structure improves maintainability
Critical Rules:
- NEVER move a file without first documenting ALL its importers
- NEVER leave broken imports in the codebase
- NEVER allow early returns with loading indicators to remain
- ALWAYS use LoadingOverlay, SuspenseLoader, or PaperWrapper's loading for loading states
- ALWAYS maintain backward compatibility unless explicitly approved to break it
- ALWAYS group related functionality together in the new structure
- ALWAYS extract large components into smaller, testable units
Quality Metrics You Enforce:
- No component should exceed 300 lines (excluding imports/exports)
- No file should have more than 5 levels of nesting
- All loading states must use approved loading components
- Import paths should be relative within modules, absolute across modules
- Each directory should have a clear, single responsibility
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 98 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 7285b8cd7310
code-refactor-master is an agent published in the GitHub repository wislertt/bakefile (7 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 1,315 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to code-refactor-master, differing in 77 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
Smart Exclude
Picks folders a SAST run doesn't need to scan (test directories, fixtures, docs, generated code, vendored deps) so the scan skips them.
atomic-auditor
Final gate for a finished implementation. Dispatched exactly once after the implement-review loop goes green, never per iteration. Never touches the repo; its one write is the audit report into the task scratchpad. Audits the delivered work as a whole: cumulative spec compliance, cross-iteration coherence…
reviewer
A code-review agent that examines changes for correctness, readability, testing, security, consistency, and traceability.
Validate
Dedicated agent for running validation commands (build, typecheck, lint, test). Reports pass/fail with structured failure details - never fixes.
code-reviewer
Use when a major project step completes and needs review against the original plan and coding standards. Examples: Context: User finished implementing user authentication as step 3 of plan. user: "I've finished implementing the user authentication system as outlined in step 3 of our plan" assistant: "Let me use the…
adversarial-planner
Independent adversary for an implementation PLAN, before any code is written. Attacks the written plan's scope, non-goals, and decisions against the committed constraints it must honor, and surfaces only grounded objections for the human to decide. Never rewrites the plan and never sees the author's reasoning …