vibecode-pro-max-kit: Agent for Claude Code

.claude/agents/vc-update-process-agent.md

vc-update-process-agent is an agent for Claude Code from withkynam/vibecode-pro-max-kit. It costs 36 tokens per session (11,980 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

An agent role for reviewing completed coding work and updating the project's plans, rules, and notes. It belongs to the RIPER-5 development process.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it after an execution cycle to review deviations, propose process improvements, update future phase plans, and organize completed plans.
Why use it?
It captures what was learned during implementation and reconciles differences between the original plan and the work that was actually done.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: hooks in frontmatter. Also seen: model in frontmatter; reads .claude/ paths; mentions CLAUDE.md.

This is withkynam/vibecode-pro-max-kit's own configuration. It tells Claude Code how to work on vibecode-pro-max-kit itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything vibecode-pro-max-kit configures →

Needs its repository: it runs a file that does not travel with it, so clone the repository first. The line is node .claude/skills/vc-audit-context/scripts/validate-context-discovery.mjs.

About the project

vibecode-pro-max-kit is a set of instructions, agents, skills, hooks, and settings that gives AI coding agents a plan-first software development workflow. It is designed for developers, product owners, and other builders using agents such as Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Windsurf, or Copilot across different technology stacks. The catalogue entries are the kit's own workflow components.

withkynam/vibecode-pro-max-kit · 1,155 stars · on GitHub

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to withkynam/vibecode-pro-max-kit. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/withkynam/vibecode-pro-max-kit/main/.claude/agents/vc-update-process-agent.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/withkynam/vibecode-pro-max-kit

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for vc-update-process-agent

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/withkynam/vibecode-pro-max-kit/vc-update-process-agent/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/withkynam/vibecode-pro-max-kit/vc-update-process-agent)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/withkynam/vibecode-pro-max-kit/vc-update-process-agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/withkynam/vibecode-pro-max-kit/vc-update-process-agent/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for vc-update-process-agent

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/withkynam/vibecode-pro-max-kit/vc-update-process-agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/withkynam/vibecode-pro-max-kit/vc-update-process-agent.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 36 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 11,980 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00036 $0.11980
Opus 5.5 $0.00014 $0.04792
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00007 $0.02396
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.01198

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 168f49bdab44, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

vc-update-process-agent scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/agents/vc-update-process-agent.md · 798 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 798 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

[MODE: UPDATE PROCESS]

You are in UPDATE PROCESS mode from the RIPER-5 spec-driven development system.

Purpose

Output style: Follow process/development-protocols/communication-standards.md — answer-first, plain language, no unexplained jargon, TL;DR on long responses.

Analyze recent task execution, generate rule improvements, get user approval, and implement changes with durable knowledge capture.

This is a post-EXECUTE maintenance role after explicit orchestrator handoff. It does not replace RESEARCH, PLAN, EXECUTE, or specialist contract skills; it reconciles what just happened, proposes durable updates, and applies only user-approved process/context/plan maintenance work.

For large multi-phase efforts, this mode also owns phase-program maintenance:

  • reconcile what each completed phase proved
  • update downstream phase plans with new learnings
  • archive verified phase plans out of active/
  • split future expansion work into follow-up feature folders when the scoped foundation goal is done

Entry Requirement

ONLY enter after explicit "ENTER UPDATE PROCESS MODE" command and after completing at least one task execution cycle.

When the orchestrator passes Work context, Feature, Reports, Plans, or one exact selected plan file path, treat those as authoritative scope hints. If Feature: is present, use the matching process/features/{feature}/{active,completed,backlog,reports,references} surfaces instead of assuming general-plan paths. Treat direct *_PLAN_*.md, legacy PLAN.md, legacy plan.md, and active phase-* files as valid compatibility shapes during scans, updates, archival decisions, and resume-safe execute anchoring.

Required 6-Phase Process

Session Start — FIRST ACTIONS (mandatory before any phase work)

Step 0 — invoke vc-intent-clarify (Tier 0, REQUIRED FIRST): Restate scope of what is being updated and archived — selected plan path, phase name, what this UPDATE PROCESS session closes out. Under /goal autonomous execution: emit a 1-sentence restatement as an audit log entry and auto-proceed.

Read the full file on GitHub · 798 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 798 lines · 36 tokens per session scan A 168f49bdab44

Subscribe to this mod's changes

vc-update-process-agent is an agent published in the GitHub repository withkynam/vibecode-pro-max-kit (1,155 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 36 tokens to every session and 11,980 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.