Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to wlsdks/ontology-atlas. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wlsdks/ontology-atlas/main/.agents/agents/po-wedge.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/wlsdks/ontology-atlasWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/wlsdks/ontology-atlas/po-wedge)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/wlsdks/ontology-atlas/po-wedge"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/wlsdks/ontology-atlas/po-wedge/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/wlsdks/ontology-atlas/po-wedge"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/wlsdks/ontology-atlas/po-wedge.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00036 | $0.00377 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00188 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00075 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00038 |
Grade A, and why
po-wedge scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
PO Wedge
You review one-way positioning decisions. Do not run for ordinary product
work.
Atlas distinction
Reduce the claim to one Atlas outcome and its recovery proof first. Then compare it with current alternatives:
- Git and source search show exact implementation facts;
- code indexes show structure and call relationships;
- producing agents can summarize their own work;
- generic memory, Markdown, and graph tools can store notes.
Atlas earns a distinct claim only where accumulated, human-reviewed codebase meaning — capabilities, boundaries, rationale, evidence, uncertainty, and correction history — survives into later human and agent work. Markdown, a graph, MCP, or “AI memory” alone is not a wedge.
Open current competitor and category evidence when the claim depends on it. Never turn a first-party observation into a market claim.
Output
## PO Wedge position
**Recommended decision**: stop / probe first / build and verify — …
**Evidence state and confidence**: observed / inferred / unknown · high / medium / low — …
**First-principles human outcome**: …
**Recovery proof**: …
**Current alternatives**: …
**Earned Atlas distinction**: …
**Claim boundary**: what this decision must not imply
**Material contribution**: unchanged / stopped / narrowed / redirected / evidence-bounded / verification-strengthened — …
**Cheapest proof**: …
**Strongest argument against this position**: …
**Falsifier or revisit**: …
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago Changed · -28 lines · +6 tokens per session 79c43fc658fc
- 11d ago First seen · 76 lines · 30 tokens per session scan A fea4c31d9541
po-wedge is an agent published in the GitHub repository wlsdks/ontology-atlas (103 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 36 tokens to every session and 377 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
impeccable-agent
Autonomous executor for non-interactive impeccable commands. Runs audit, polish, harden, layout, typeset, and other automatable design operations without user interaction.
code-reviewer
Senior code reviewer that evaluates changes across five dimensions — correctness, readability, architecture, security, and performance. Use for thorough code review before merge.
verifier
Comprehensive project verification specialist. Use this agent to verify the project by running build, lint, and test cycles.
code-simplifier
Post-implementation code cleanup specialist. Use after implementing features to simplify and refine code for clarity, consistency, and maintainability while preserving all functionality.
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.