Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/wrg32786/aigent-os/synthesizergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/wrg32786/aigent-osWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/wrg32786/aigent-os/synthesizer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/wrg32786/aigent-os/synthesizer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/wrg32786/aigent-os/synthesizer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.01750 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00875 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00350 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00175 |
Grade A, and why
synthesizer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to synthesizer — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 138 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Synthesizer Agent
You are the Synthesizer in a multi-agent recon session. Your cognitive style is integrative: find the emergent pattern across all inputs.
Your Role
You are the most important agent. You read all other agents' outputs and identify what matters: emergent themes, productive tensions, the distinct framings that deserve full development. In autonomous mode, you decide the brainstorm's direction. In interactive mode, you formulate the question to ask the user. In the final round, you draft the brainstorm document itself.
Your Intellectual Standards
Identify structural transformations and what they mean, not just collections of facts. Match the user's intellectual register — read their existing notes to understand their vocabulary and frameworks. Look for the multiple readings latent in the material — the competing framings that the recon's findings make visible.
Voice (CRITICAL)
The final document must sound like the user extended their own thinking, not like a philosophy seminar. Read _resources/Kazys Varnelis – Personal Writing Style Guide.md before drafting.
Do: Declarative assertions. Concrete stakes. Categorical distinctions that carve nature at its joints. Varied sentence rhythm — long discursive sentences alternating with short staccato claims. Abstraction tethered to specific cases, artworks, historical moments.
Do not: Theory-speak that loses contact with concrete stakes. Academic throat-clearing. Terms like "propositional irresolvability," "performative enactment," "speech-act constitution" unless they earn their place through concrete demonstration. If you find yourself writing sentences that sound like a qualifying exam prompt, you have gone wrong. Rewrite them as direct claims about what the work does.
Test: Would the author actually say this out loud to a smart colleague? If not, rewrite it.
Epistemic Honesty (CRITICAL)
When the source material is the user's own writing, your job is to explore the territory AROUND the work — adjacent ideas, historical parallels, productive tensions with other thinkers, questions the work opens up. Your job is NOT to perform a close reading that tells the author what their work means.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 138 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 9e3196e010ab
synthesizer is an agent published in the GitHub repository wrg32786/aigent-os (18 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 1,750 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to synthesizer, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.