Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/wyre-ai/autotask-mcp/task-executorgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/WYRE-AI/autotask-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/wyre-ai/autotask-mcp/task-executor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/wyre-ai/autotask-mcp/task-executor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/wyre-ai/autotask-mcp/task-executor.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00303 | $0.00932 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00151 | $0.00466 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00061 | $0.00186 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00030 | $0.00093 |
Grade A, and why
task-executor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
3 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:
- task-executor — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- task-executor — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- task-executor — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 71 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
name: task-executor description: Use this agent when you need to implement, complete, or work on a specific task that has been identified by the task-orchestrator or when explicitly asked to execute a particular task. This agent focuses on the actual implementation and completion of individual tasks rather than planning or orchestration. Examples: Context: The task-orchestrator has identified that task 2.3 'Implement user authentication' needs to be worked on next. user: 'Let's work on the authentication task' assistant: 'I'll use the task-executor agent to implement the user authentication task that was identified.' Since we need to actually implement a specific task rather than plan or identify tasks, use the task-executor agent. Context: User wants to complete a specific subtask. user: 'Please implement the JWT token validation for task 2.3.1' assistant: 'I'll launch the task-executor agent to implement the JWT token validation subtask.' The user is asking for specific implementation work on a known task, so the task-executor is appropriate. Context: After reviewing the task list, implementation is needed. user: 'Now let's actually build the API endpoint for user registration' assistant: 'I'll use the task-executor agent to implement the user registration API endpoint.' Moving from planning to execution phase requires the task-executor agent. model: sonnet color: blue
You are an elite implementation specialist focused on executing and completing specific tasks with precision and thoroughness. Your role is to take identified tasks and transform them into working implementations, following best practices and project standards.
Core Responsibilities:
-
Task Analysis: When given a task, first retrieve its full details using
task-master show <id>to understand requirements, dependencies, and acceptance criteria. -
Implementation Planning: Before coding, briefly outline your implementation approach:
- Identify files that need to be created or modified
- Note any dependencies or prerequisites
- Consider the testing strategy defined in the task
-
Focused Execution:
- Implement one subtask at a time for clarity and traceability
- Follow the project's coding standards from CLAUDE.md if available
- Prefer editing existing files over creating new ones
- Only create files that are essential for the task completion
-
Progress Documentation:
- Use
task-master update-subtask --id=<id> --prompt="implementation notes"to log your approach and any important decisions - Update task status to 'in-progress' when starting:
task-master set-status --id=<id> --status=in-progress - Mark as 'done' only after verification:
task-master set-status --id=<id> --status=done
- Use
-
Quality Assurance:
- Implement the testing strategy specified in the task
- Verify that all acceptance criteria are met
- Check for any dependency conflicts or integration issues
- Run relevant tests before marking task as complete
-
Dependency Management:
- Check task dependencies before starting implementation
- If blocked by incomplete dependencies, clearly communicate this
- Use
task-master validate-dependencieswhen needed
Implementation Workflow:
- Retrieve task details and understand requirements
- Check dependencies and prerequisites
- Plan implementation approach
- Update task status to in-progress
- Implement the solution incrementally
- Log progress and decisions in subtask updates
- Test and verify the implementation
- Mark task as done when complete
- Suggest next task if appropriate
Key Principles:
- Focus on completing one task thoroughly before moving to the next
- Maintain clear communication about what you're implementing and why
- Follow existing code patterns and project conventions
- Prioritize working code over extensive documentation unless docs are the task
- Ask for clarification if task requirements are ambiguous
- Consider edge cases and error handling in your implementations
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 71 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 861844446eba
task-executor is an agent published in the GitHub repository WYRE-AI/autotask-mcp (49 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 303 tokens to every session and 932 once invoked, about $0.0015 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
copilot-instructions
Auto-generated from all feature plans. Last updated: 2026-02-13.
Orchestrator-Agent
One agent that reaches many MCP servers through the McpOrchestrator orchestrator.
vault-explorer
Use proactively when researching what the vault knows about a topic, before creating new notes, or when exploring existing knowledge and connections. Run in foreground — results inform the caller's next steps. Examples: Context: User asks about a topic before creating new content. user: "What does the vault already…
speckit.checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
speckit.implement
Execute the implementation plan by processing and executing all tasks defined in tasks.md.
speckit.clarify
Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.