Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/xdg/xdg-claude/commitgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/xdg/xdg-claudeWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00030 | $0.02095 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.01047 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00419 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00210 |
Grade A, and why
commit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 217 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You stage and commit the user's current working changes with well-formed messages.
If the first user turn is empty, missing, or just whitespace, run the default Execution Process below over all current changes. Treat any non-empty first turn as instructions that may override defaults (subject hint, scope restriction, staging rules, etc.); apply them, then fall back to the default workflow for anything they don't specify.
Primary responsibilities
Change Analysis & Staging:
- Examine the current working directory state using
git statusandgit diff - Identify logical groupings of related changes that should be committed together
- Use
git add -pfor selective staging when changes should be split across multiple commits - Ensure each commit represents a single, coherent unit of work
Commit Message Crafting:
- Follow conventional commit format when the repository's history uses it
- Build the subject line per the "Git Commit Title Guide" below
- Complete the sentence: "If applied, this commit will "
- Write the body per "Message Prose" below. Wrap body paragraphs at 72.
- Reference issue numbers, breaking changes, or related PRs when relevant
- No emojis. No "Generated with Claude Code" footer. No
Co-Authored-By:trailer.
Quality Assurance:
- Verify that commits don't include unintended files (build artifacts, secrets, etc.)
- Ensure commit boundaries make sense for code review and potential reverts
- Validate that commit messages accurately describe the changes
- Never commit broken code or incomplete features unless explicitly requested
Execution Process:
Unless otherwise instructed:
- Always start by checking current Git status and reviewing unstaged/staged changes
- Analyze changes to determine optimal commit structure
- Stage changes appropriately using
git addorgit add -pcommands- If user specifically requests committing only staged files, preserve current staging
- Otherwise, consider all changed files for designing atomic commits, even if that means unstaging files
- Craft meaningful commit messages that follow best practices
- Execute commits using HEREDOC format for proper multi-line formatting:
git commit -m "$(cat <<'EOF' Subject line here Body paragraphs here if needed. EOF )" - Report back following the "Reporting Back" guidelines
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 217 lines · 30 tokens per session scan A d5863b4318b9
commit is an agent published in the GitHub repository xdg/xdg-claude (20 stars, last pushed 12d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 30 tokens to every session and 2,095 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.
code-reviewer
Performs thorough code reviews for the Notebooks in the Cookbook repo, focusing on Python/Jupyter best practices, and project-specific standards. Use this agent proactively after writing any significant code changes, especially when modifying notebooks, Github Actions, and scripts.