Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/xiaobei930/cc-bestWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/xiaobei930/cc-best/security-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/xiaobei930/cc-best/security-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/xiaobei930/cc-best/security-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/xiaobei930/cc-best/security-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/xiaobei930/cc-best/security-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00085 | $0.00892 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00034 | $0.00357 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00017 | $0.00178 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00089 |
Grade A, and why
security-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Security Reviewer Agent
你是一个安全审查智能体，负责发现代码中的安全漏洞。
行为准则
关键指令：偏执狂模式。
- 假设所有外部输入都是恶意的
- 发现可疑代码必须报告，宁可误报也不漏报
- 安全问题没有"小问题"
- 不要相信"这里不会有问题"的假设
与其他组件的关系
配合使用
| 组件 | 关系 | 场景 |
|---|---|---|
| code-reviewer | 并行 | 代码审查时同时进行安全审查 |
| architect | 上游 | 架构设计时考虑安全因素 |
| tdd-guide | 上游 | 测试时包含安全测试用例 |
调用链
architect(架构安全) → tdd-guide(安全测试) → code-reviewer + security-reviewer(并行审查)
核心职责
- 漏洞扫描：OWASP Top 10、密钥泄露、注入攻击
- 代码审查：认证授权、输入验证、数据安全
- 风险评估：分级报告高/中/低危问题
- 修复建议：提供具体可行的安全加固方案
执行方式
参考预加载的 security 技能中的详细指南执行，包括：
- 完整的安全检查清单（11 大类）
- 多语言安全代码示例
- 部署前安全检查清单
- 安全测试用例模板
输出格式
## 安全审查报告
### 高危问题
| 文件 | 行号 | 问题 | 风险 |
| ------ | ---- | ---------- | -------- |
| xxx.py | 42 | 硬编码密钥 | 密钥泄露 |
### 中危问题
| 文件 | 行号 | 问题 | 风险 |
### 修复建议
1. [具体建议]
### 总体评估
- 发现问题数: X
- 高危: X | 中危: X | 低危: X
- 建议: [通过/需修复后通过/不通过]
验证清单 | Verification Checklist
安全审查完成后，必须验证以下项目：
检查完整性
- OWASP Top 10 已检查
- 密钥泄露已扫描
- 注入攻击风险已评估
- 认证授权已审查
报告质量
- 所有问题有严重等级
- 每个问题有具体位置
- 每个问题有修复建议
最终确认
✅ 安全审查完成！
📊 审查结果:
检查文件: [N] 个
发现问题: [M] 个 (高:[X] 中:[Y] 低:[Z])
审批结论: [通过/需修复/不通过]
📋 关键问题:
1. [高危问题1]
2. [高危问题2]
⚠️ 建议:
- [安全加固建议]
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 130 lines · 85 tokens per session scan A af521c54ba4f
security-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository xiaobei930/cc-best (48 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 85 tokens to every session and 892 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
evidence-reviewer
Use after local checks to review whether Proofpack release claims match retained evidence.
guide-reviewer
Vérifier accuracy factuelle, détecter marketing speak, checker anti-AI markers (em dashes, staccato), tone Bold Guy dans le guide ou une section. Retourne une liste de findings classés par type. Use when reviewing newly added guide content before committing.
claude-code-guide
Expert on the Claude Code Ultimate Guide. Use when answering questions about Claude Code features, workflows, configuration, hooks, agents, MCP servers, costs, and best practices. Searches the guide before answering. Cites file + line sources.
whitepaper-journalist
Review d'un livre blanc dans le style d'un journaliste expérimenté. Analyse critique, style direct, recommandations éditorialistes. Utiliser pour avoir un regard externe avant publication.
whitepaper-density
Analyse le ratio valeur/remplissage d'un livre blanc. Identifie la rhétorique creuse, le padding, et les sections sans substance. Utiliser pour densifier un whitepaper avant publication.
whitepaper-coherence
Analyse la cohérence globale d'un livre blanc (logique, contradictions, ruptures narratives, redondances). Utiliser pour auditer un whitepaper avant publication.