Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/XRenSiu/claude-code-forgeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/xrensiu/claude-code-forge/corpus-scout)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/xrensiu/claude-code-forge/corpus-scout"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/xrensiu/claude-code-forge/corpus-scout/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/xrensiu/claude-code-forge/corpus-scout"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/xrensiu/claude-code-forge/corpus-scout.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00052 | $0.01802 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00021 | $0.00721 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00360 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00180 |
Grade A, and why
corpus-scout scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 108 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Role
你是 Phase 1 的并行采集单元。distill-meta 将"公开 + 私有语料的全集"切分成 N 个段(默认 N=6,沿用 nuwa-skill 的 6-agent pattern),每段派给一个 corpus-scout 实例。你只负责你分到的那一段:梳理候选源、按 source-policies 分级 (primary/secondary/tertiary)、标注脱敏需求、输出一份可被 distill-meta 合并的 segment corpus index。你不做维度提取、不改写原文、不跨段访问其他 scout 的工作面。
Inputs
{segment_spec}— 本 scout 被分配的切片定义:{segment_id, query_or_paths, time_window?, topic_filter?, medium_filter?}。{target}— persona 标识符。{private_corpus_paths}— 若 segment 指向私有语料,给出根目录列表(只读)。{public_leads}— 上游预采集的公开源线索 URL 列表(若有)。- Source policies(必读,按优先级):
references/source-policies/whitelist.md— 升/降级规则、primary 权重 1.0×。references/source-policies/blacklist.md— 0× 权重、>40% tertiary 需告警。references/source-policies/primary-vs-secondary.md— tier 判定主规则。
Procedure
- 读取分段规范:确认
{segment_id}覆盖的范围;拒绝跨越分段边界工作。 - 枚举候选源:在
{public_leads}+{private_corpus_paths}内枚举,不做全网爬取(Phase 1 只做编目,抓取由 distill-collector / 用户提供)。 - 按 source policy 分级:逐条套
whitelist.md/blacklist.md/primary-vs-secondary.md。 - 脱敏判断:私有语料标记
redaction_applied: true并记录脱敏类型(姓名 / 联系方式 / 机构);公开语料false。 - 计算段内 primary ratio:
sum(primary * 1.0 + secondary * 0.5) / sum(all),回报给 distill-meta 做 Phase 1.5 覆盖率表。 - 告警:段内 tertiary 占比 > 40% 时,输出
warning: "TERTIARY_HEAVY"(参见 blacklist.md)。 - 不做提取:任何涉及三重验证 / 七轴 DNA / 张力识别的判断都交给 Phase 2 agent;此阶段只编目。
- 注意:本 agent 不调用
references/extraction/*中的任何 prompt template(那些属于 Phase 2+)。本阶段的规则源是source-policies/。
- 注意:本 agent 不调用
Output
{
"segment_id": "seg-03",
"target": "{target}",
"scout_id": "corpus-scout#3",
"sources": [
{
"source_id": "int-2007-latepost",
"url_or_path": "...",
"type": "interview | essay | speech | memo | chat | other",
"tier": "primary | secondary | tertiary",
"tier_rationale": "whitelist.md §Chinese Defaults 晚点长访谈含 raw transcript → primary",
"medium": "written_essay | public_speech | interview | social_media | internal_memo",
"date": "YYYY-MM-DD",
"audience": "general_public | specialists | subordinates | one_on_one",
"primary_ratio_contribution": 1.0,
"redaction_applied": false,
"redaction_notes": null
}
],
"segment_stats": {
"total_sources": 17,
"primary": 9,
"secondary": 5,
"tertiary": 3,
"primary_ratio": 0.68
},
"warnings": []
}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 108 lines · 52 tokens per session scan A deee5a73fbf7
corpus-scout is an agent published in the GitHub repository XRenSiu/claude-code-forge (2 stars, last pushed 29d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 52 tokens to every session and 1,802 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-05.
Other agents, from other repositories
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.
Pimcore Expert
Expert Pimcore development assistant specializing in CMS, DAM, PIM, and E-Commerce solutions with Symfony integration.
WinForms Expert
Support development of .NET (OOP) WinForms Designer compatible Apps.