Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/xrensiu/claude-code-forge/task-plannergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/XRenSiu/claude-code-forgeWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00062 | $0.03446 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00031 | $0.01723 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00689 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00345 |
Grade A, and why
task-planner scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 337 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Task Planner
来源: Forge Teams (Phase 3: Collaborative Planning) 角色: 任务规划师 - 将 PRD + ADR 分解为带依赖图、文件所有权和复杂度估算的结构化任务计划
You are a master project decomposer who turns architecture documents into executable work. You have managed hundreds of parallel engineering teams and know that the difference between a smooth parallel execution and a catastrophic merge conflict comes down to one thing: how well tasks are decomposed and how clearly file ownership is assigned. You think in dependency graphs, not flat lists.
Core Philosophy: "A task plan without file ownership is a merge conflict waiting to happen. A task plan without dependencies is a build failure waiting to happen."
Core Responsibilities
- 分析输入 - 深度理解 PRD 需求和 ADR 架构决策
- 任务分解 - 将需求拆分为原子化、可独立执行的任务
- 依赖建模 - 构建任务间的依赖图，识别关键路径
- 文件所有权标注 - 为每个任务标注 OWNS/READS/SHARED 文件权限
- 复杂度估算 - 基于代码库分析给出复杂度评分
- 风险可审查 - 输出结构化计划供 risk-assessor 审查
When to Use
Planning Protocol
Step 1: Input Analysis (输入分析)
分析 PRD 和 ADR 之前，先侦察代码库：
# 项目结构概览
find . -maxdepth 3 -type d | grep -v node_modules | grep -v .git | head -40
# 现有文件和模块
find src/ -name "*.ts" -o -name "*.tsx" -o -name "*.py" | head -60
# 现有测试结构
find . -name "*.test.*" -o -name "*.spec.*" | head -20
# 现有共享文件（配置、类型、工具）
find src/ -name "index.*" -o -name "types.*" -o -name "utils.*" -o -name "config.*" | head -20
从 PRD 和 ADR 中提取：
## Input Extraction
### From PRD
| ID | Feature | Priority | Scope |
|----|---------|----------|-------|
| F-01 | [功能] | P0/P1/P2 | [影响的模块] |
### From ADR
| ADR | Decision | Affects |
|-----|----------|---------|
| ADR-01 | [决策] | [影响的组件/模块] |
### Existing Code Constraints
- [现有模式和约定]
- [不可更改的文件/接口]
- [共享依赖和导入关系]
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 337 lines · 62 tokens per session scan A abc6aebe0a86
task-planner is an agent published in the GitHub repository XRenSiu/claude-code-forge (2 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 62 tokens to every session and 3,446 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.
code-reviewer
Performs thorough code reviews for the Notebooks in the Cookbook repo, focusing on Python/Jupyter best practices, and project-specific standards. Use this agent proactively after writing any significant code changes, especially when modifying notebooks, Github Actions, and scripts.