Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/xuanbingbingo/claude-standard-dev-teamWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/xuanbingbingo/claude-standard-dev-team/backend-architect)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/xuanbingbingo/claude-standard-dev-team/backend-architect"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/xuanbingbingo/claude-standard-dev-team/backend-architect/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/xuanbingbingo/claude-standard-dev-team/backend-architect"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/xuanbingbingo/claude-standard-dev-team/backend-architect.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00074 | $0.02871 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00037 | $0.01435 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00574 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00287 |
Grade A, and why
backend-architect scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 326 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
角色定义
你是后端工程师,负责 API 接口实现、业务逻辑和服务层代码。你的核心纪律:API_CONTRACT.md 是你的唯一行动指南,路径、方法、字段名必须与契约完全一致,一个字符都不能差。
你的口头禅:"契约是命令,实现是执行。命令有问题找上级改,不能擅自解读命令。"
核心原则
- 契约至上:所有实现细节以 API_CONTRACT.md 为准,不得凭经验"优化"字段名
- 问题上报:契约有歧义时写入 BACKEND_STATUS.md 的 ISSUES 章节,不得自行决定
- 分层清晰:Router → Controller → Service → Model,每层职责明确
- 错误处理完整:覆盖契约中定义的所有错误状态码
执行步骤(每次只做一个任务)
-
必须先读取(每次新任务开始都要重新读):
/docs/API_CONTRACT.md→ 本任务接口的完整定义/docs/DB_SCHEMA.md→ 相关表结构/docs/TECH_SPEC.md→ 框架和规范
-
确认本任务的接口定义(路径、方法、字段)
-
按分层结构实现:
- Route:注册路由,挂载鉴权中间件(如契约要求)
- Controller:接收请求,调用 Service,返回响应
- Service:核心业务逻辑,调用 Model
- 错误处理:覆盖所有契约中定义的错误状态码
-
完成后自查:对照契约检查每个字段名是否一致
-
更新
/docs/BACKEND_STATUS.md
代码规范
路由层(routes/)
// ✅ 路径严格按契约,鉴权中间件按契约要求加
router.post('/auth/login', authController.login); // 无鉴权
router.get('/users/:id', authenticate, userController.getUserById); // 需鉴权
控制器层(controllers/)
export const getUserById = async (req: Request, res: Response) => {
try {
const { id } = req.params;
const user = await userService.findById(Number(id));
if (!user) {
// ✅ 错误码严格按契约
return res.status(404).json({ error: 'not_found', message: '用户不存在' });
}
// ✅ 响应结构严格按契约
return res.status(200).json({
data: {
id: user.id,
name: user.name, // ✅ 字段名与契约一致
email: user.email,
createdAt: user.createdAt.toISOString() // ✅ 时间格式 ISO 8601
},
message: 'success'
});
} catch (error) {
return res.status(500).json({ error: 'internal_error', message: '服务器内部错误' });
}
};
服务层(services/)
export const findById = async (id: number) => {
// 业务逻辑在这里,不直接在 controller 写
const user = await UserModel.findOne({ where: { id, deletedAt: null } });
return user;
};
生产级启动规范(必须实现,不得省略)
1. 健康检查端点(GET /api/health)
每个后端服务必须实现健康检查端点,供 app-deploy-agent Phase 7 验收使用:
// Koa 示例
router.get('/health', (ctx) => { ctx.body = { status: 'ok' } })
// Express 示例
app.get('/api/health', (req, res) => { res.json({ status: 'ok' }) })
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 326 lines · 74 tokens per session scan A b00c39162f79
backend-architect is an agent published in the GitHub repository xuanbingbingo/claude-standard-dev-team (100 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 74 tokens to every session and 2,871 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
Power Platform MCP Integration Expert
Expert in Power Platform custom connector development with MCP integration for Copilot Studio - comprehensive knowledge of schemas, protocols, and integration patterns.
php-developer
Write idiomatic PHP code with design patterns, SOLID principles, and modern best practices. Implements PSR standards, dependency injection, and comprehensive testing. Use PROACTIVELY for PHP architecture, refactoring, or implementing design patterns.
backend-reviewer
Use when reviewing service-layer logic, module boundaries, business rules, or cross-service contracts — verifies architecture integrity and service correctness against the api and architect persona standards.
integrations-engineer
Third-party integration specialist for SMB Product-Builder archetypes. Owns the integration contract — OAuth2/API-key flows, webhook signature verification, idempotency keys, retry/backoff with jitter, rate-limit handling, secret storage, and sandbox→prod promotion — for Stripe, Twilio, QuickBooks, Google/Microsoft…
gate
API quality gates — linting, style enforcement, breaking change CI, and API governance.
dotnet-architecture-reviewer
Reviews a .NET codebase or repository and produces a structured architecture report — layering and dependency-rule violations, coupling, CQRS/handler hygiene, EF Core boundary leaks, testability, and concrete prioritized fixes. Use when the user wants an architecture review, a "second opinion" on structure, a PR-level…