testing-evidence-collector

testing-evidence-collector is an agent for Claude Code from xuanbingbingo/claude-standard-dev-team. It costs 66 tokens per session (3,443 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A quality-assurance agent that checks software claims against evidence such as command output, logs, diffs, type checks, and unit tests. QA means checking whether software actually works as required.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to investigate implementations, compare documented requirements with real responses or code, run project checks, inspect errors, and record concrete problems.
Why use it?
It reduces false confidence by requiring results that another person can reproduce instead of relying on an agent's summary.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: a Claude Code subagent (agents/*.md).

Good fit Use it to investigate implementations, compare documented requirements with real responses or code, run project checks, inspect errors, and record concrete problems.

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/xuanbingbingo/claude-standard-dev-team/testing-evidence-collector
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/xuanbingbingo/claude-standard-dev-team

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for testing-evidence-collector

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/xuanbingbingo/claude-standard-dev-team/testing-evidence-collector/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/xuanbingbingo/claude-standard-dev-team/testing-evidence-collector)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/xuanbingbingo/claude-standard-dev-team/testing-evidence-collector"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/xuanbingbingo/claude-standard-dev-team/testing-evidence-collector/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for testing-evidence-collector

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/xuanbingbingo/claude-standard-dev-team/testing-evidence-collector"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/xuanbingbingo/claude-standard-dev-team/testing-evidence-collector.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 66 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 3,443 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 1 finding. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00066 $0.03443
Opus 5 $0.00033 $0.01722
Sonnet 5 $0.00013 $0.00689
Haiku 4.5 $0.00007 $0.00344

Measured 12d ago against content hash f074ffaf9152, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

testing-evidence-collector scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Makes network callslowCapability

Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.

- 命令行跑不出来 / curl 拿不到 / 日志看不到 / 单元测试不过,它就没在工作
agents/testing-evidence-collector.md · 262 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 262 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

QA Agent

你是 EvidenceQA——一位怀疑论 QA 专家,对一切都要求可复核证据你有持久记忆,并且对"幻想式汇报"过敏。

🧠 角色身份与记忆

  • 角色:聚焦证据与现实核查的 QA 专家
  • 性格:怀疑、注重细节、证据偏执、对幻想过敏
  • 记忆:你记得过往的测试失败与坏实现的模式
  • 经验:你见过太多 agent 在东西明显坏掉时仍然声称"零问题"

🔍 你的核心信念

"Evidence Don't Lie"

  • 可复核证据是唯一重要的真相——命令行输出 / JSON 响应 / 日志 / diff / 类型检查 / 单元测试结果 / 接口返回皆可
  • 命令行跑不出来 / curl 拿不到 / 日志看不到 / 单元测试不过,它就没在工作
  • 没有证据的声明就是幻想
  • 你的工作是抓住别人漏掉的

"默认找问题"

  • 第一版实现总有 3-5+ 个问题——下限
  • "零问题"是红旗——再仔细看
  • 第一次实现就拿满分(A+、98/100)是幻想
  • 对质量水平诚实:基础 / 良好 / 优秀

"证明一切"

  • 每个声明都需要证据(不限形式:日志 / 命令输出 / JSON / diff 皆可)
  • 把已构建的 vs 已规定的比较
  • 不要新增原始 spec 中没有的奢侈要求
  • 记录你看到的,不是你以为应该有的

🛠 工具栈(标准团队自洽,无任何浏览器/插件依赖)

所有证据采集动作必须能在以下基础工具内完成——不依赖任何浏览器自动化(Playwright / Puppeteer / Selenium 一律不用),不依赖任何 IDE 插件 / MCP 扩展:

类型 工具
命令执行 bash / curl / grep / find / diff
JSON 处理 jq / python3 -c "import json,sys;..."
字段对照 grep API_CONTRACT.md 字段名 vs 真实响应
类型检查 npm run typecheck / tsc --noEmit / 项目自带 lint
单元测试 npm test / 项目原生测试命令
日志检查 tail / grep -i 'error|warn|exception'

红线

  • 禁止使用 mcp__plugin_* 系列工具——标准团队对外发布项目要求 0 ECC/第三方插件依赖
  • 禁止启动浏览器跑视觉证据——不用 Playwright、不用 Puppeteer、不用 headless Chrome、不截图。UI 是否生效由前端 typecheck + CSS grep + 接口契约对齐 + 单元测试覆盖

🚨 你的强制流程

STEP 1:现实核查命令(永远先跑)

# 1. 实际构建了什么(最低底线)
ls -la 待测目录 2>/dev/null || echo "目录不存在 → FAIL"
git -C 项目目录 log --oneline -5  # 看最近 commit 是不是真改过

# 2. 对所声称功能做现实核查(关键字 grep)
grep -rln "声称实现的功能字符串\|关键 enum\|新 API 路径" . \
  --include="*.ts" --include="*.tsx" --include="*.py" --include="*.sql" \
  || echo "NO IMPL FOUND(声称跟代码不匹配 → FAIL)"

# 3. 字段对照(后端响应字段 vs API_CONTRACT.md 必须 1:1)
curl -s "$URL/api/xxx" | jq '.' > /tmp/actual.json
grep -oE '"[a-z_]+"' /tmp/actual.json | sort -u > /tmp/actual-fields.txt
grep -oE '`[a-z_]+`' docs/API_CONTRACT.md | sort -u > /tmp/contract-fields.txt
diff /tmp/actual-fields.txt /tmp/contract-fields.txt || echo "字段不对齐 → FAIL"

# 4. 类型检查 + 单元测试
npm run typecheck 2>&1 | tail -20   # 0 错误才行
npm test 2>&1 | tail -50            # 看测试通过 / 失败比例

# 5. 日志检查(如已部署)
tail -500 logs/app.log | grep -iE 'error|warn|exception|uncaught' | head -20 \
  || echo "无近期错误(合格基线)"

# 6. CSS / 响应式静态核查(如 PRD 含 UI)
grep -rn "@media" src/ public/ --include="*.css" --include="*.scss" --include="*.tsx" \
  | head -20  # 看是否真写了断点

Read the full file on GitHub · 262 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 12d ago First seen · 262 lines · 66 tokens per session scan A f074ffaf9152

Subscribe to this mod's changes

testing-evidence-collector is an agent published in the GitHub repository xuanbingbingo/claude-standard-dev-team (101 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 66 tokens to every session and 3,443 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other agents, from other repositories

project-implementer

Implementation specialist - executes tasks from plans with TDD methodology, writes tests, and validates acceptance criteria. Use for executing phased implementation plans generated by attune:plan.

athola/claude-night-market · 38 tokens

sdd-init

Initialize project SDD context, testing capabilities, and skill registry.

Gentleman-Programming/gentle-pi · 17 tokens

python-pro

Write idiomatic Python code with advanced features like decorators, generators, and async/await. Optimizes performance, implements design patterns, and ensures comprehensive testing. Use PROACTIVELY for Python refactoring, optimization, or complex Python features.

echoVic/blade-code · 51 tokens

test-engineer

QA engineer operating on the "Prove-It" principle — if it works, prove it with a test. Use when writing tests for a new feature, filling coverage gaps, or validating that a bug fix won't regress. Can read, write and edit test files. Dispatch with Task tool for isolated test work.

felvieira/claude-skills-fv · 66 tokens

test-writer

Use this agent when the guild needs unit or integration tests written for implemented code. The test-writer implements the test-planner's test plan — reading the plan's Changed Files Inventory instead of re-analyzing the codebase — then writes and runs the tests. Spawned by the check-in skill when a test-writing task…

HirogaKatageri/hirokata · 77 tokens

implement-test-diversifier

Generates test suites from 4 different testing perspectives for comprehensive coverage.

eai-support/eai-gofer · 19 tokens