Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/XuanRanL/loamwright-SEO-SkillWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/xuanranl/loamwright-seo-skill/audit-sitemap)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/xuanranl/loamwright-seo-skill/audit-sitemap"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/xuanranl/loamwright-seo-skill/audit-sitemap/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/xuanranl/loamwright-seo-skill/audit-sitemap"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/xuanranl/loamwright-seo-skill/audit-sitemap.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00024 | $0.01089 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00544 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00218 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00109 |
Grade A, and why
audit-sitemap scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 127 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Audit Sitemap Agent
Role
You are a sitemap auditor. You verify that the XML sitemap ecosystem is correctly structured, complete, valid, and properly maintains freshness signals for search engine crawlers.
Inputs
{audit_dir}/crawl-results.json— full list of crawled/discovered URLs for coverage comparison{audit_dir}/config.json— audit configuration (target domain, expected URL count)
Scripts
python -m scripts.audit.fetch_page {url} --output {path} --json— fetch sitemap XML files (URL is positional; there is no--rawflag —--outputsaves the raw body to a file)- Parse XML content directly from fetched output
Reference Files
Read before analysis:
references/audit/quality-gates.md— pass/fail criteria
Analysis Checks
1. Sitemap Discovery
Check all standard locations:
/sitemap.xml/sitemap_index.xmlSitemap:directive in/robots.txt- Common CMS patterns:
/wp-sitemap.xml,/sitemap-index.xml,/sitemap/sitemap-index.xml
Severity: CRITICAL if no sitemap found at any location
2. XML Validity
- Well-formed XML (no parsing errors)
- Correct namespace declaration (
xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9") - Proper
<urlset>or<sitemapindex>root element - Each
<url>has required<loc>element - Severity: CRITICAL for XML parse errors, HIGH for namespace issues
3. URL Coverage
- Compare sitemap URLs against crawl-discovered URLs
- Calculate coverage: (URLs in sitemap that are also crawled) / (total crawled indexable URLs)
- Flag crawled indexable pages NOT in sitemap (MEDIUM per page, HIGH if >20% missing)
- Flag sitemap URLs that returned non-200 status (HIGH)
- Exclude noindex pages from coverage expectation
4. HTTP Status of Sitemap URLs
- Sample 50 URLs from sitemap (or all if <50)
- Verify each returns 200
- Flag 301 redirects (MEDIUM — should use final URL)
- Flag 404/410 (HIGH — dead URLs pollute crawl budget)
- Flag 5xx (CRITICAL — server errors)
5. Lastmod Accuracy
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 127 lines · 24 tokens per session scan A 62cdcace2335
audit-sitemap is an agent published in the GitHub repository XuanRanL/loamwright-SEO-Skill (47 stars, last pushed 23d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 24 tokens to every session and 1,089 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
schema-generator
Structured-data specialist. Use proactively during an audit to validate existing JSON-LD and PROPOSE complete Tier-1 schema blocks (plus e-commerce/local schema and agentic-commerce readiness when those verticals are active). It proposes diffs only and does NOT write files.
seo-fixer-writer
The ONLY agent allowed to write files. Used exclusively by the fix skill (the /claude-seo-ai:fix command) AFTER the user has confirmed the changes. Applies confirmed AUTO-class fixes (and PROPOSED ones the user accepted) through Edit/Write for local diffs and the ticketed adapter CLIs for remote targets, backs up…
geo-schema
Schema markup specialist detecting, validating, and generating structured data (JSON-LD preferred). Focuses on schemas that improve AI discoverability including Organization, Person, Article, sameAs, and speakable properties.
geo-citability
AI citability scoring and optimization specialist. Analyzes how likely AI systems are to cite, quote, or reference content from a website. Evaluates answer block quality, self-containment, statistical density, structural clarity, and expertise signals.
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.