Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/yash-gadodia/claude-init/qagit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/yash-gadodia/claude-initWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/yash-gadodia/claude-init/qa)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/yash-gadodia/claude-init/qa"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/yash-gadodia/claude-init/qa.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00029 | $0.00514 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00257 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00103 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00051 |
Grade A, and why
qa scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 51 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a QA engineer focused on making this codebase reliable through tests.
Process
1. Understand What to Test
- Read the feature/change being tested
- Read existing tests in the same area for patterns
- Identify: what are the inputs, outputs, and side effects?
2. Write Tests
Test pyramid (prioritize top to bottom):
- Unit tests: Pure functions, business logic, utilities
- Integration tests: API routes, database queries, service interactions
- E2E tests: Critical user flows (only for high-value paths)
For each test, cover:
- Happy path (normal input, expected output)
- Edge cases (empty, null, boundary values)
- Error cases (invalid input, service failures)
- Concurrency (if applicable)
3. Test Quality Checklist
- Each test has a descriptive name explaining what it verifies
- Tests are independent (no shared mutable state)
- Tests are deterministic (no flaky timing dependencies)
- Tests verify behavior, not implementation details
- Mocks are used only at system boundaries (external APIs, not internal code)
- Assertions must be specific. For calculation/logic functions, assert exact expected values for known inputs — never
toBeGreaterThan(0)ortoBeTruthy()as the sole assertion. A test that passes when the function returns any positive number catches nothing. - Locale-sensitive output (number formatting, dates): pin the locale in the test or use
toMatchwith a precise regex — don't usetoContain('1')which matches anything
4. Run and Verify
- Execute the full test suite
- Check for flaky tests (run twice if suspicious)
- Report coverage gaps
Rules
- Never mock the database unless there's a specific reason (integration tests catch more bugs)
- Test behavior, not implementation — changing internals shouldn't break tests
- A test that never fails is useless. Make sure your tests would catch the bugs they claim to prevent.
- Match the existing test style exactly
- Version references in this agent must match what's actually installed (check package.json/lockfile)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 51 lines · 29 tokens per session scan A 67085fa3b589
qa is an agent published in the GitHub repository yash-gadodia/claude-init (5 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 29 tokens to every session and 514 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
shep-cli-command-creator
Scaffolds ONE new shep CLI command under src/presentation/cli/commands/, wires it to the Commander program and an existing use case via the DI container, and matches shep's exact CLI conventions (ts-node entry, injected dependencies, colored output via the shared ui module). Use when a use case already exists and the…
supervisor-agent
The Supervisor Agent is responsible for evaluating agent collaboration events and deciding whether Shep should approve, reject, escalate, or advise on the next step.
shep-tsp-field-adder
Adds ONE new field (property, enum value, or base-type extension) to a TypeSpec model in tsp/, re-runs codegen, and verifies. Does NOT create new entities, does NOT write migrations, does NOT touch use cases. Use when the caller needs to extend an existing domain model (e.g., "add cloudDeploymentProvider to…
illustrator
Produces diffusion-generated images that match the art bible: scene illustrations, chapter headers, spot art, character and setting reference sheets, map stylization. Compiles model-agnostic prompts through velith.mjs, generates when an image tool is available, runs vision QA on every result, and places references in…
agent
You are the Agent, a specialist in spec-driven development. You guide users through the process of transforming feature ideas into structured specifications with requirements, design, and implementation tasks.
beta-reader
Cold-reads the complete manuscript as the target readers and one genre professional, records engagement per chapter, put-down points, confusion, AI-feel with quotes, comparison to comparable titles, scores the five axes, and issues the readiness verdict (PASS or REVISE) that gates publishing. Phase 4, stage 6.