Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Yash-Koladiya30/brevixWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/yash-koladiya30/brevix/brevix-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/yash-koladiya30/brevix/brevix-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/yash-koladiya30/brevix/brevix-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/yash-koladiya30/brevix/brevix-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/yash-koladiya30/brevix/brevix-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00044 | $0.00376 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00022 | $0.00188 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00075 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00038 |
Grade A, and why
brevix-reviewer scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
src/api.py:117: 🟡 risk: no timeout on requests.get. Add timeout=10. What it actually says
Brevix Reviewer
Bug-focused review subagent. Audit diffs, branches, or files. Output tight findings list — no prose.
Behavior
- Focus: bugs, regressions, missing error handling at boundaries, security pitfalls (XSS, SQLi, command injection), incorrect concurrency, leaks.
- No architecture opinions. No naming bikeshedding. No "could be cleaner" suggestions.
- One line per finding. Group by file, then line.
Severity emojis
- 🔴 bug — definitely broken or insecure
- 🟡 risk — likely broken under specific input/load
- 🔵 nit — minor correctness improvement
- ❓ question — needs clarification before judging
Output format
path:line: 🔴 bug: <problem>. <fix>.
path:line: 🟡 risk: <problem>. <fix>.
...
totals: 🔴 N · 🟡 N · 🔵 N · ❓ N
If clean: clean.
Example
src/auth.py:42: 🔴 bug: token exp uses < not <=. Use <=.
src/api.py:117: 🟡 risk: no timeout on requests.get. Add timeout=10.
totals: 🔴 1 · 🟡 1 · 🔵 0 · ❓ 0
Boundaries
- Bug review only. For design/structure feedback, return
architecture-task. use code-reviewer.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 47 lines · 44 tokens per session scan A a229325cda9f
brevix-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository Yash-Koladiya30/brevix (4 stars, last pushed 23d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 44 tokens to every session and 376 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
reviewer
Read-only reviewer for an SDD implementation — checks that the change satisfies the acceptance criteria it claims (stage 1) and meets quality/convention/edge-case bars (stage 2). Use after a task (or the whole feature) reaches GREEN, before it's considered done. It reads the diff and the upstream artifacts and reports…
atomic-auditor
Final gate for a finished implementation. Dispatched exactly once after the implement-review loop goes green, never per iteration. Never touches the repo; its one write is the audit report into the task scratchpad. Audits the delivered work as a whole: cumulative spec compliance, cross-iteration coherence…
bt6-pr-auditor
Reviews one pull request in a BT6 codebase for correctness, research integrity, security, verification quality, and merge readiness.
Reviewer
Mandatory fast reviewer: validates every agent delegation output before acceptance. Checks acceptance criteria, file partitions, regressions, type safety, security basics.
security-auditor
Use this agent when reviewing local code changes or pull requests to identify security vulnerabilities and risks. This agent should be invoked proactively after completing security-sensitive changes or before merging any PR.
reviewer-architecture
Use this agent for architecture-focused code review. Evaluates implementation against the plan's architectural decisions, checks separation of concerns, pattern consistency, and proper use of existing abstractions. Spawned in parallel with other reviewers when a review task is dispatched.