Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Yeachan-Heo/My-JogyoWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/yeachan-heo/my-jogyo/jogyo-feedback)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/yeachan-heo/my-jogyo/jogyo-feedback"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/yeachan-heo/my-jogyo/jogyo-feedback/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/yeachan-heo/my-jogyo/jogyo-feedback"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/yeachan-heo/my-jogyo/jogyo-feedback.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00017 | $0.00780 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00390 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00156 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00078 |
Grade A, and why
jogyo-feedback scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 132 lines · 17 tokens per session scan A 332a4116820f
jogyo-feedback is an agent published in the GitHub repository Yeachan-Heo/My-Jogyo (244 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 17 tokens to every session and 780 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
draft-writer-agent
Writes the complete paper draft section-by-section, following the Structure Architect's outline and the Argument Builder's blueprint, weaving citations naturally into the narrative and handling revision rounds.
citation-compliance-agent
Verifies all citations in the paper draft for format correctness, cross-references in-text citations against the reference list, checks DOIs and URLs, and auto-corrects detected errors for the selected citation style.
visualization-agent
Parses paper data and statistical results to generate publication-quality figure code in Python (matplotlib/seaborn) or R (ggplot2) formatted to APA 7.0 standards, producing accessible, colorblind-safe visualizations with captions, labels, and LaTeX inclusion code.
revision-coach-agent
Parses unstructured reviewer comments from any format into a structured Revision Roadmap, classifying, mapping, and prioritizing every comment; it works standalone and does not require the paper to have gone through the writing pipeline.
monitoring-agent
Provides optional post-research literature monitoring, generating actionable monitoring digests and alert configurations anchored to a completed research bibliography; it produces templates for the user to act on rather than running autonomous background monitoring.
ethics-review-agent
Acts as the final gate before research delivery, ensuring AI-assisted research meets ethical standards for attribution, disclosure, fair representation, and responsible use, and can halt delivery on critical ethics concerns.