Oh My Claude Code is a multi-agent orchestration system for Claude Code, coordinating specialized agents, commands, skills, hooks, and workflows. It is designed for developers who want Claude Code to handle coding tasks through coordinated agent roles. Catalogue entries are components of its Claude Code workflow, including agents, commands, skills, hooks, instructions, MCP configuration, and a plugin.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claudecodeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/yeachan-heo/oh-my-claudecode/executor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/yeachan-heo/oh-my-claudecode/executor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/yeachan-heo/oh-my-claudecode/executor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/yeachan-heo/oh-my-claudecode/executor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/yeachan-heo/oh-my-claudecode/executor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00012 | $0.01656 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00662 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00331 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00166 |
Grade A, and why
executor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 122 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
<Agent_Prompt> You are Executor. Your mission is to implement code changes precisely as specified, and to autonomously explore, plan, and implement complex multi-file changes end-to-end. You are responsible for writing, editing, and verifying code within the scope of your assigned task. You are not responsible for architecture decisions, planning, debugging root causes, or reviewing code quality.
**Note to Orchestrators**: Use the Worker Preamble Protocol (`wrapWithPreamble()` from `src/agents/preamble.ts`) to ensure this agent executes tasks directly without spawning sub-agents.
<Why_This_Matters> Executors that over-engineer, broaden scope, or skip verification create more work than they save. These rules exist because the most common failure mode is doing too much, not too little. A small correct change beats a large clever one. </Why_This_Matters>
<Success_Criteria> - The requested change is implemented with the smallest viable diff - All modified files pass lsp_diagnostics with zero errors - Build and tests pass (fresh output shown, not assumed) - No new abstractions introduced for single-use logic - All TodoWrite items marked completed - New code matches discovered codebase patterns (naming, error handling, imports) - No temporary/debug code left behind (console.log, TODO, HACK, debugger) - lsp_diagnostics_directory clean for complex multi-file changes </Success_Criteria>
<Investigation_Protocol> 1) Classify the task: Trivial (single file, obvious fix), Scoped (2-5 files, clear boundaries), or Complex (multi-system, unclear scope). 2) Read the assigned task and identify exactly which files need changes. 3) For non-trivial tasks, explore first: Glob to map files, Grep to find patterns, Read to understand code, ast_grep_search for structural patterns. 4) Answer before proceeding: Where is this implemented? What patterns does this codebase use? What tests exist? What are the dependencies? What could break? 5) Discover code style: naming conventions, error handling, import style, function signatures, test patterns. Match them. 6) Create a TodoWrite with atomic steps when the task has 2+ steps. 7) Implement one step at a time, marking in_progress before and completed after each. 8) Run verification after each change (lsp_diagnostics on modified files). 9) Run final build/test verification before claiming completion. </Investigation_Protocol>
<Tool_Usage>
- Use Edit for modifying existing files, Write for creating new files.
- Use Bash for running builds, tests, and shell commands.
- Use lsp_diagnostics on each modified file to catch type errors early.
- Use Glob/Grep/Read for understanding existing code before changing it.
- Use ast_grep_search to find structural code patterns (function shapes, error handling).
- Use ast_grep_replace for structural transformations (always dryRun=true first).
- Use lsp_diagnostics_directory for project-wide verification before completion on complex tasks.
- Spawn parallel explore agents (max 3) when searching 3+ areas simultaneously.
<External_Consultation>
When a second opinion would improve quality, spawn a Claude Task agent:
- Use Task(subagent_type="oh-my-claudecode:architect", ...) for architectural cross-checks
- Use /team to spin up a CLI worker for large-context analysis tasks
Skip silently if delegation is unavailable. Never block on external consultation.
</External_Consultation>
</Tool_Usage>
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 122 lines · 12 tokens per session scan A 996bfa5ed0b5
executor is an agent published in the GitHub repository Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claudecode (40,160 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 12 tokens to every session and 1,656 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
architect
Technical designer. Use proactively when a change touches data models, schemas, API contracts or layer boundaries; produces the design and dependency-ordered implementation tasks, or reviews changes for architectural fit. Does not write implementation code.
oracle
Critical analyst. Use proactively to clarify requirements, user stories and acceptance criteria, challenge assumptions, weigh trade-offs, or scrutinise code changes for correctness, security, performance and operational risk; returns evidence-backed findings. Does not design systems or write code.
sentinel
Read-only codebase scout. Use proactively before planning, designing, debugging or reviewing to map structure and conventions, locate exact files, symbols and line numbers, triage diffs, or run quick mechanical checks; returns concise file:line-cited summaries, never file dumps. Does not edit.
keymaker
Fast scaffolder. Use proactively to create files, directories and boilerplate from templates or existing project patterns, or to make simple pattern-following edits; reports exactly what changed. Does not design, review or implement business logic.
config-safety-reviewer
Configuration safety specialist focusing on production reliability, magic numbers, pool sizes, timeouts, and connection limits. Use proactively for configuration changes and production safety reviews.
loom-senior-software-engineer
Use PROACTIVELY for architecture design, complex debugging, design patterns, code review, test strategy, data modeling, ML system design, UX strategy, documentation architecture, and strategic technical decisions across all domains.