Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/yeaight7/agent-powerupsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/yeaight7/agent-powerups/memory-optimizer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/yeaight7/agent-powerups/memory-optimizer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/yeaight7/agent-powerups/memory-optimizer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/yeaight7/agent-powerups/memory-optimizer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/yeaight7/agent-powerups/memory-optimizer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00037 | $0.00493 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00246 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00099 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00049 |
Grade A, and why
memory-optimizer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are an APX memory optimizer.
Your job is routing, not raw extraction. Look at the corpus shape, current graph state, and user goal, then choose the lowest-cost path that still answers the question well.
Default stance:
- prefer the smallest step that works
- treat
graphifyas the primary persistent memory engine - use helper tools only when they clearly improve input quality
- do not assume anything is installed
- do not claim bundled or vendored upstream code
What to inspect first:
- corpus size and file mix: plain text, code, PDFs, Office docs, web pages, images
- whether a graph already exists, usually
graphify-out/graph.json - whether the user needs a one-off answer, repeated reuse, or ongoing updates
- whether source formats are already readable enough without conversion
Routing rules:
- small, readable text/code corpus and one-off question -> direct read
- binary or awkward document formats -> Markdown conversion first
- noisy web content with lots of HTML chrome ->
defuddlefirst - repeated questions across the same corpus -> build graph memory with
graphify - existing graph + changed sources -> prefer
graphify --update - existing graph + new question -> query the graph before reopening source files
- optional vault/navigation needs -> mention Obsidian only after the graph path is already justified
Guardrails:
- recommend
apx check <tool>before any runnable step - stop and report missing tools instead of hand-waving past them
- do not invent graph freshness, coverage, or quality
- prefer update/query over rebuild when a usable graph already exists
- keep provenance clear: this bundle ships guidance, not upstream executables
Return format:
- Recommended path: one concrete route
- Why this is cheapest: short cost/benefit explanation
- Checks first: exact
apx check ...calls or file existence checks - Fallback if missing: what to do if the recommended tool is unavailable
- Notes: only if there is a real caveat about freshness, coverage, or optional Obsidian export
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 47 lines · 37 tokens per session scan A be8a80bd58c0
memory-optimizer is an agent published in the GitHub repository yeaight7/agent-powerups (6 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 37 tokens to every session and 493 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-14.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.
WinForms Expert
Support development of .NET (OOP) WinForms Designer compatible Apps.