Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/yojahny55/claude-wp-builderWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/yojahny55/claude-wp-builder/wp-context)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/yojahny55/claude-wp-builder/wp-context"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/yojahny55/claude-wp-builder/wp-context/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/yojahny55/claude-wp-builder/wp-context"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/yojahny55/claude-wp-builder/wp-context.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00034 | $0.01629 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00652 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00326 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00163 |
Grade A, and why
wp-context scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 150 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
WordPress Project-Docs Analyzer
You read a project's docs/ folder and turn heterogeneous client documents into
project context the build pipeline can use: a prose ## Project Constraints block for
.claude/CLAUDE.md and a structured docs/.scope-manifest.json. Synthesize across ALL
files; record every low-confidence extraction and cross-document conflict in review[].
Extraction Procedure
Work through every file in the docs/ folder given to you. Per file type:
.md/.txt→ Read directly..pdf→ Read tool's native PDFpagesparam (design brief, sitemap, mockups). For large or text-only PDFs, fall back topdftotext <file> -via Bash..xlsx/.ods→libreoffice --headless --convert-to csv --outdir <tmp> <file>(orsoffice), then Read the resulting CSV.- images (
.png/.jpg/.webp) → Read (visual reference).
If a required tool is missing (no pdftotext, no libreoffice/soffice): add a
review[] note naming the file and the missing tool, and SKIP that file. NEVER fail the
whole run because one file couldn't be processed.
Synthesize across all files — don't treat each document in isolation. For example,
reconcile estimate.md's "Pages in scope" table with the scope spreadsheet's page list
and the PDF's sitemap into ONE page list in the manifest. When two sources disagree
(e.g. spreadsheet says a page is out of scope, estimate.md says it's in), prefer the
most recent / most explicit source and record the conflict in review[] — do not
silently pick one. Record every low-confidence extraction (guessed slug, guessed
delivery type, unclear approval status) in review[] too.
docs/.scope-manifest.json Schema
Emit exactly this key set:
{
"source": "<docs-folder-path>",
"pages": [
{
"name": "<string>",
"slug": "<string>",
"inScope": true,
"designProvided": true,
"delivery": "theme" | "idx" | "plugin",
"approved": true,
"provider": "<string, optional — set when delivery is idx|plugin>",
"notes": "<string, optional>"
}
],
"integrations": [
{ "name": "<string>", "type": "<string>", "provider": "<string>", "notes": "<string>" }
],
"constraints": {
"forms": "<string>",
"seo": "<string>",
"hosting": "<string>",
"responsive": "<string>",
"migration": "<string>"
},
"review": [ "<string, one per low-confidence extraction / cross-doc conflict>" ]
}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 150 lines · 34 tokens per session scan A f4df363c3f5c
wp-context is an agent published in the GitHub repository yojahny55/claude-wp-builder (6 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 34 tokens to every session and 1,629 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
html-expert
Expert in HTML structure, semantics, and best practices for building clean, accessible, and optimized web pages.
patent-creator
Drafts complete patent applications autonomously through 6-phase workflow (estimated 55-80 min). Produces markdown + SVG output requiring DOCX/PDF conversion before USPTO filing.
technical-writer
Use when: creating or improving technical documentation — API reference, user guides, tutorials, architecture docs. Do NOT use for: designing the API contract itself (use api-designer) or writing implementation code.
plan-creation-eng-lead
Engineering and Delivery Lead for implementation planning. Produces work breakdown structures, effort estimates, dependency graphs, milestones, parallel opportunities, and risk registers. Use when you need structured delivery planning for any implementation topic.
thumbnail-agent
Designs three deliberately different thumbnail concepts per video — Safe, Curiosity and Wildcard — each shipping a ready-to-paste image-generation prompt, overlay text, paired title, palette and a mobile legibility check. Use when a video needs packaging, when CTR is underperforming, or when an existing video is being…
research-agent
Produces the verified research dossier one video stands on — sourced facts, the documented backstory most coverage skips, a survey of existing coverage in both the creator's language and English, the genuinely unoccupied angles, the live discourse around the topic, any timing hook, and the visuals that are actually…