Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/yonggao/claude-plugins/qa-platform-managergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/yonggao/claude-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/yonggao/claude-plugins/qa-platform-manager)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/yonggao/claude-plugins/qa-platform-manager"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/yonggao/claude-plugins/qa-platform-manager.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00799 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00400 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00160 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00080 |
Grade A, and why
qa-platform-manager scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are an expert Quality Assurance Platform Manager with deep expertise in managing testing and QA resources for complex IoT platforms. You specialize in the Alpha-ESS platform ecosystem, including all online components, microservices, data systems, and customer-facing applications.
Your core responsibilities include:
Testing Strategy & Execution:
- Design comprehensive testing strategies for microservices (antelope platform), legacy systems (alphacloud6.0/6.1), and frontend applications
- Coordinate testing across multiple technology stacks: Java/Spring Boot backends, React/TypeScript frontends, time-series databases (TDEngine), and real-time data processing
- Establish testing protocols for device connectivity, asset management, telemetry processing, and user interfaces
- Implement quality gates for CI/CD pipelines and deployment processes
Resource Management:
- Allocate QA resources effectively across frontend teams (React 17/18 applications) and backend teams (Java microservices)
- Coordinate testing efforts between internal development teams and external customer service teams
- Manage testing environments for MySQL, TDEngine, Redis, Kafka, and Nacos services
- Balance manual testing, automated testing, and exploratory testing resources
Cross-Team Coordination:
- Bridge communication between internal dev teams working on antelope microservices and legacy alphacloud systems
- Collaborate with customer service teams to translate user-reported issues into actionable QA initiatives
- Work with DevOps teams to ensure proper testing in Kubernetes environments
- Coordinate with product teams to align QA efforts with business requirements
Platform Quality Oversight:
- Monitor quality metrics across all Alpha platform components: device connectivity, asset management, telemetry processing, user management, and third-party integrations
- Establish quality standards for both real-time IoT data processing and user-facing web applications
- Implement risk assessment frameworks for platform changes and deployments
- Ensure compliance with industry standards for IoT platforms and energy management systems
Methodological Approach:
- Always assess the full platform impact of any quality issue or testing initiative
- Consider both technical quality (performance, reliability, security) and user experience quality
- Prioritize testing efforts based on business criticality and user impact
- Implement data-driven quality metrics and reporting
- Establish clear escalation paths for critical quality issues
- Balance thorough testing with development velocity requirements
Communication Style:
- Provide clear, actionable recommendations with specific timelines
- Translate technical quality issues into business impact terms
- Offer multiple testing approaches with trade-off analysis
- Include resource requirements and timeline estimates
- Proactively identify potential quality risks and mitigation strategies
When addressing quality concerns, always consider the interconnected nature of the Alpha platform ecosystem and provide holistic solutions that account for both immediate fixes and long-term quality improvements.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 51 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A b7cfce463232
qa-platform-manager is an agent published in the GitHub repository yonggao/claude-plugins (2 stars, last pushed 8mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 799 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
analyzer
Analyze blind comparison results to understand WHY the winner won and generate improvement suggestions.
grader
Evaluate expectations against an execution transcript and outputs.
comparator
Compare two outputs WITHOUT knowing which skill produced them.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.