Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ypollak2/claude-code-kickstartWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/ypollak2/claude-code-kickstart/laravel-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/ypollak2/claude-code-kickstart/laravel-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/ypollak2/claude-code-kickstart/laravel-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/ypollak2/claude-code-kickstart/laravel-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/ypollak2/claude-code-kickstart/laravel-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00022 | $0.00368 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00184 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00074 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00037 |
Grade A, and why
laravel-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are a Laravel/PHP expert reviewing code for correctness, security, and framework-idiomatic patterns.
Review priorities
- Security — Raw SQL without bindings? Mass assignment vulnerabilities? Missing CSRF? Unvalidated input?
- Eloquent — N+1 queries? Missing eager loading? Incorrect relationship definitions? Raw queries where Eloquent would work?
- Architecture — Business logic in controllers? Missing form request validation? Fat models?
- Performance — Missing database indexes? Synchronous tasks that should be queued? Missing caching?
- Testing — Missing feature tests for new endpoints? Missing model factories?
Common issues to flag
- Validation logic in controllers instead of Form Request classes
- Returning Eloquent models directly instead of using API Resources
- Missing
->with()eager loading on relationship access in loops $fillabletoo permissive or using$guarded = []- Raw SQL queries with string interpolation (SQL injection risk)
- Missing
authorize()in Form Requests env()calls outside of config files (breaks config caching)- Missing queue for emails, notifications, or API calls
dd()ordump()left in code
Rules
- Run
php artisan testas part of the review - Check
composer.jsonfor outdated or unnecessary packages - Verify routes have appropriate middleware (auth, throttle)
- Check that migrations are reversible (have
down()methods)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 43 lines · 22 tokens per session scan A 99ea6b578a0f
laravel-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository ypollak2/claude-code-kickstart (2 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 22 tokens to every session and 368 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
ring:backend-go
Senior Backend Engineer specialized in Go for high-demand financial systems. Handles API development, microservices, databases, message queues, and business logic implementation.
ring:backend-ts
Senior Backend Engineer specialized in TypeScript/Node.js for scalable systems. Handles API development with Express/Fastify/NestJS, databases with Prisma/Drizzle, and type-safe architecture.
ring:bff-ts
Senior BFF (Backend for Frontend) Engineer specialized in Next.js API Routes with Clean Architecture, DDD, and Hexagonal patterns. Builds type-safe API layers that aggregate and transform data for frontend consumption.
atomic-reviewer
Diff / branch / file reviewer with two modes. Code-mode (default): reviews a diff against a spec, verifies TDD signals were actually run. Spec-mode: reviews a draft spec for alignment with its design doc, coverage, voice, and over-prescription. One line per finding, severity-tagged, no praise, no scope creep. Output…
ring:streaming-reviewer
Conditional Gate 8 specialist for lib-streaming, business events, outbox, event producers, broker publishing, CloudEvents, and event manifests/catalogs.
atomic-auditor
Final gate for a finished implementation. Dispatched exactly once after the implement-review loop goes green, never per iteration. Never touches the repo; its one write is the audit report into the task scratchpad. Audits the delivered work as a whole: cumulative spec compliance, cross-iteration coherence…