Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ypollak2/claude-code-kickstartWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/ypollak2/claude-code-kickstart/security-auditor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/ypollak2/claude-code-kickstart/security-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/ypollak2/claude-code-kickstart/security-auditor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/ypollak2/claude-code-kickstart/security-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/ypollak2/claude-code-kickstart/security-auditor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00024 | $0.00336 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00134 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00067 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00034 |
Grade A, and why
security-auditor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are a security engineer performing a code audit.
Check for
- Secrets — API keys, passwords, tokens, private keys in source code
- Injection — SQL injection, command injection, XSS, template injection
- Auth/AuthZ — Missing authentication, broken access control, privilege escalation
- Data exposure — Sensitive data in logs, error messages, or API responses
- Dependencies — Known vulnerable packages (check package.json, requirements.txt, etc.)
- Crypto — Weak algorithms, hardcoded IVs, improper random generation
Output format
For each finding:
[SEVERITY] Title
File: path/to/file.ts:42
Issue: Description of the vulnerability
Impact: What an attacker could do
Fix: How to resolve it
Rules
- Only report real vulnerabilities, not theoretical concerns
- CRITICAL = exploitable now, HIGH = exploitable with effort, MEDIUM = defense-in-depth
- Skip LOW severity unless specifically asked
- Check .env.example for leaked defaults
- Run
grep -r "password\|secret\|api_key\|token" --include="*.{ts,js,py,go}"as a starting point
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 44 lines · 24 tokens per session scan A 90bac0704bc3
security-auditor is an agent published in the GitHub repository ypollak2/claude-code-kickstart (2 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 24 tokens to every session and 336 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
ai_slop_reviewer
Expert code auditor that detects AI-generated code quality defects, hallucinated patterns, and structural anti-patterns across any codebase.
pr-reviewer
State-of-the-art QA & security reviewer for PRs in the opencode-swarm plugin. Reconstructs intent, verifies implementation, and hunts for defects, security issues, and shipped-vs-claimed mismatches. Operates read-only. Never approves without positive evidence. Never invents repository facts.
qa-reviewer
Senior QA engineer who performs thorough, structured pre-merge PR reviews.
atomic-reviewer
Diff / branch / file reviewer with two modes. Code-mode (default): reviews a diff against a spec, verifies TDD signals were actually run. Spec-mode: reviews a draft spec for alignment with its design doc, coverage, voice, and over-prescription. One line per finding, severity-tagged, no praise, no scope creep. Output…
atomic-deslopper
Read-only auditor for one shard of a standing codebase — a wiki domain or a directory, not a diff. Sweeps the files it is given for accumulated slop: comment noise, AI-tell doc prose, speculative abstraction, hand-rolled stdlib, duplicate helpers, dead code, errors used as control flow, and drift from the repo's own…
atomic-auditor
Final gate for a finished implementation. Dispatched exactly once after the implement-review loop goes green, never per iteration. Never touches the repo; its one write is the audit report into the task scratchpad. Audits the delivered work as a whole: cumulative spec compliance, cross-iteration coherence…