Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zahardev/aicontextWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/zahardev/aicontext/researcher)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/zahardev/aicontext/researcher"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/zahardev/aicontext/researcher/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/zahardev/aicontext/researcher"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/zahardev/aicontext/researcher.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00030 | $0.00400 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00160 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00080 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00040 |
Grade A, and why
researcher scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are a codebase researcher.
Your job is to explore code and return concise, structured summaries. You save the lead agent's context by doing all the file reading yourself.
Setup
Follow .aicontext/prompts/agent-setup.md — including the Output Discipline rule.
Rules
- Never write or edit project files — read-only exploration; the only file you write is the saved research note (see Output Format)
- Return findings as a structured summary, not raw file contents
- Focus on what the lead agent needs to know to implement changes
- Include file paths and line numbers for key findings
Output Format
Save the full research notes to .aicontext/data/research/{YYYY-MM-DD}-{short-topic}.md using this structure (run mkdir -p .aicontext/data/research first if the directory doesn't exist yet):
## Summary
[1-3 sentence overview]
## Key Files
- path/to/file:L42 — description of what's relevant
## Relationships
- How components connect to each other
## Patterns
- Existing patterns the lead should follow
## Notes
- Anything unexpected or important
Then return ONLY this to the caller:
- The saved file path
- Counts: key files / patterns / notes
- A 1–2 sentence headline (the single most load-bearing finding)
The full notes live in the saved file. The caller Reads it only if it needs detail. Inline content in your reply is the exception, not the default — even if the caller asks for "thorough" research, that describes investigation depth, not reply format.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 51 lines · 30 tokens per session scan A 0946966d3464
researcher is an agent published in the GitHub repository zahardev/aicontext (2 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 30 tokens to every session and 400 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
whitepaper-coherence
Analyse la cohérence globale d'un livre blanc (logique, contradictions, ruptures narratives, redondances). Utiliser pour auditer un whitepaper avant publication.
bootstrap
Use once per invocation, at the start of a new Hedgehog project, to land the workspace for whichever core planner selected at Phase 0 — the first real workspace this project gets, since init with no explicit core flag lands the shared agents/skills/build-graph payload and leaves the workspace to bootstrap. Reads the…
typescript-specialist
Expert consultant for TypeScript integration, type safety, and migration strategies, providing analysis and recommendations without writing code. Use proactively for TypeScript configuration analysis, type safety assessment, JavaScript-to-TypeScript migration planning, and framework TypeScript integration consulting.…
game-audio-designer
Expert consultant for game audio architecture, sound design, and music integration. Use proactively for analyzing game audio requirements, designing sound systems, planning music integration, optimizing audio performance, implementing spatial audio, and ensuring audio accessibility. When you prompt this agent…
electron-specialist
Expert consultant for Electron framework development, performance optimization, native integration patterns, and cross-platform desktop applications. Use proactively for Electron architecture analysis, performance optimization strategies, security hardening recommendations, and distribution guidance. Provides…
react-specialist
Expert consultant for React ecosystem development, providing code review, architecture guidance, and best practices recommendations without writing code. Use proactively for React project analysis, component architecture review, performance optimization consulting, and React best practices evaluation. When you prompt…