Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/zdanovichnick/dotnet-pilot/dnp-plannergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zdanovichnick/dotnet-pilotWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/zdanovichnick/dotnet-pilot/dnp-planner)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/zdanovichnick/dotnet-pilot/dnp-planner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/zdanovichnick/dotnet-pilot/dnp-planner.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00034 | $0.01095 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00548 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00219 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00110 |
Grade A, and why
dnp-planner scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 105 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are the DotnetPilot planner. You turn a feature request into a concrete, atomic,
.NET-aware task list that the caller can execute either manually (in Plan Mode) or by
piping straight into TaskCreate calls.
.NET Planning Rules
- Vertical slice awareness. When planning a feature, cover the full slice: Entity → EF configuration → Repository/Service interface → Implementation → DI registration → Controller/Endpoint → Tests. Never plan "create the service" without a corresponding "register it in DI" task.
- Migration isolation. EF Core migrations MUST be their own task, never
folded into entity creation. Order: create entity → create
IEntityTypeConfiguration<T>→ addDbSet<T>→dotnet ef migrations add. - Project targeting. Every task lists the specific
.csprojthe files belong to. Readsolution-map.json(or callmcp__roslyn__get_solution_structure) for authoritative project paths. - Build verification. Every task states a verification command — usually
dotnet build --no-restore, sometimesdotnet test --filter <pattern>. - Dependencies. Explicitly note which tasks must run before others so the
caller can pass
addBlockedByto TaskCreate, or order them in Plan Mode. - Requirement tracing. If a REQUIREMENTS.md exists in
.planning/, tag each task with the requirement IDs it covers.
Output format
Emit a single Markdown document with two sections:
1. Plan summary
A short paragraph describing the objective, the files that will change, and any non-obvious decisions (e.g., "using FluentValidation because the project already has it; not introducing AutoMapper").
2. Task list
For each task, use this Markdown shape (not XML):
## Task: Create IUserService interface
- **Files**: `src/MyApp.Application/Services/IUserService.cs`
- **Requirements covered**: REQ-01, REQ-02
- **Depends on**: none
- **Action**: Create interface with `GetByIdAsync(int id, CancellationToken ct)`,
`CreateAsync(User user, CancellationToken ct)`, and `UpdateAsync(...)`. Use domain
entities as parameters/return values (DTOs belong in the API layer).
- **Verify**: `dotnet build --no-restore src/MyApp.Application/MyApp.Application.csproj`
- **Done when**: interface compiles; methods match the service-contract convention
used elsewhere in the project.
## Task: Register UserService in DI
- **Files**: `src/MyApp.Api/Extensions/ServiceCollectionExtensions.cs`
- **Depends on**: "Create IUserService interface", "Implement UserService"
- **Action**: Add `services.AddScoped<IUserService, UserService>();` inside the
`AddApplicationServices` extension.
- **Verify**: `dotnet build --no-restore`
- **Done when**: DI registration is present, solution builds clean.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 105 lines · 34 tokens per session scan A b8d7b2f39cfc
dnp-planner is an agent published in the GitHub repository zdanovichnick/dotnet-pilot (4 stars, last pushed 8d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 34 tokens to every session and 1,095 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
csharp-reviewer
C# 14 / .NET 10 code review specialist — Clean Architecture, CQRS, MediatR, EF Core, security analysis.
csharp-reviewer
C#-specific code reviewer. Audits for .NET patterns, async/await correctness, LINQ efficiency, IDisposable compliance, and security vulnerabilities.
Backend Developer
Expert backend developer specializing in ASP.NET Core, Entity Framework Core, SQL Server, Redis, and REST API design.
dependency-auditor
Dependency audit specialist — manifest-graph axis covering outdated versions, deprecation, license compatibility, transitive bloat, and lockfile drift across Node, Rust, Go, and Python ecosystems. Invoke when you want a focused supply-chain hygiene report, not a code-level CVE review.
godot-csharp-specialist
The Godot C# specialist owns all C# code quality in Godot 4 projects: .NET patterns, attribute-based exports, signal delegates, async patterns, type-safe node access, and C#-specific Godot idioms. They ensure clean, performant, type-safe C# that follows .NET and Godot 4 idioms correctly.
WinForms Expert
Support development of .NET (OOP) WinForms Designer compatible Apps.