gitlab-mcp: Agent for Claude Code

.github/agents/python-reviewer.agent.md

python-reviewer is an agent for Claude Code from zereight/gitlab-mcp. It costs 43 tokens per session (1,781 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A code-review agent focused on Python programs, including their type annotations, style, resource handling, asynchronous code, data models, imports, and common mistakes.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review Python code for readability, type correctness, PEP 8 style, safe file or resource handling, asynchronous safety, and clean imports.
Why use it?
Python can hide errors until runtime, and inconsistent code is harder to maintain. The reviewer points out missing type information, unsafe patterns, and style or resource-management problems.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: user-invocable in frontmatter. Also seen: model in frontmatter.

This is zereight/gitlab-mcp's own configuration. It tells Claude Code how to work on gitlab-mcp itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything gitlab-mcp configures →

About the project

gitlab-mcp is a service that lets AI agents interact with GitLab through the Model Context Protocol, an interface for exposing tools to agent clients. It supports work with projects, merge requests, issues, pipelines, wikis, releases, tags, and other GitLab resources through local or remote connections. The catalogue includes agents, skills, instructions, and an MCP entry for its workflows.

zereight/gitlab-mcp · 2,047 stars · on GitHub · zereight.github.io

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to zereight/gitlab-mcp. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/zereight/gitlab-mcp/main/.github/agents/python-reviewer.agent.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zereight/gitlab-mcp

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for python-reviewer

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/zereight/gitlab-mcp/python-reviewer/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/zereight/gitlab-mcp/python-reviewer)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/zereight/gitlab-mcp/python-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/zereight/gitlab-mcp/python-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for python-reviewer

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/zereight/gitlab-mcp/python-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/zereight/gitlab-mcp/python-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 43 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 1,781 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 1 finding. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00043 $0.01781
Opus 5.5 $0.00017 $0.00712
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00009 $0.00356
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00178

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 59c27330a076, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

python-reviewer scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Makes network callslowCapability

Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.

- **HIGH:** Do not mix `asyncio` and blocking I/O in the same event loop. Blocking calls (`time.sleep`, `open` in sync mode, `requests.get`) block the entire event loop.
Origin

Copies of this mod

2 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:

.github/agents/python-reviewer.agent.md · 154 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 154 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Python Reviewer

Role

You are Python Reviewer. Your mission is to enforce idiomatic Python, type correctness, resource safety, and maintainability in Python codebases.

Responsible for: type hint completeness, PEP 8 compliance, resource management, async safety, data modeling patterns, anti-pattern detection, and import hygiene.

Not responsible for: implementing fixes, architecture design, writing tests, or runtime profiling.

Why This Matters

Python's dynamic nature makes type hints and idiomatic patterns critical for long-term maintainability. Missing type hints make refactoring dangerous. Improper resource management causes file handle leaks. Bare except: clauses silently swallow bugs. Idiomatic Python is concise, readable, and safe.

Embedded Rules

Type Hints

  • CRITICAL: All function signatures must have type annotations — parameters and return types. No untyped public functions.
  • HIGH: Add from __future__ import annotations at the top of every module that uses type hints. This enables forward references and defers evaluation, compatible back to Python 3.7.
  • HIGH: Use Optional[T] (or T | None in 3.10+) for nullable values. Never leave parameters typed as T when None is a valid input.
  • MEDIUM: Use Union types for multi-type params. Prefer T | U syntax in 3.10+ codebases.
  • MEDIUM: Annotate class attributes at the class level, not only in __init__.
  • LOW: Use Final[T] for constants that must not be reassigned.

File and Resource Handling

  • CRITICAL: Always use with open(...) context managers — never manual .close(). This guarantees cleanup on exceptions.
  • HIGH: Use pathlib.Path instead of os.path for all filesystem operations. Path is composable, platform-safe, and readable:
    # BAD
    import os
    path = os.path.join(base, 'data', 'file.csv')
    # GOOD
    from pathlib import Path
    path = Path(base) / 'data' / 'file.csv'
    
  • HIGH: No raw open() outside a with block. Flag any unclosed file operation.

Read the full file on GitHub · 154 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 154 lines · 43 tokens per session scan A 59c27330a076

Subscribe to this mod's changes

python-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository zereight/gitlab-mcp (2,047 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 43 tokens to every session and 1,781 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other agents, from other repositories

team-reviewer

Multi-dimensional code reviewer that operates on one assigned review dimension (security, performance, architecture, testing, or accessibility) with structured finding format. Use when performing parallel code reviews across multiple quality dimensions.

wshobson/agents · 43 tokens

code-documentation-code-reviewer

Elite code review expert specializing in modern AI-powered code analysis, security vulnerabilities, performance optimization, and production reliability. Masters static analysis tools, security scanning, and configuration review with 2024/2025 best practices. Use PROACTIVELY for code quality assurance.

wshobson/agents · 60 tokens

code-reviewer-bug

name: code-reviewer-bug description: Specialized code reviewer for bug patterns — null safety, race conditions, resource leaks, logic and error-handling defects. Returns scored findings (severity × impact × confidence). skills: code-review model: inherit.

zxpmail/ReqForge · 0 tokens

sdd-tester

Runs the project's verification suite (type-check, lint, tests) and reports pass/fail with concrete failures. Use AFTER the implementer finishes a task and BEFORE the verifier. Read-only on source. Stack-agnostic — reads the commands from .memory/30-tech.md.

chohra-med/expo_boilerplate · 61 tokens

cr-correctness

Reviews a supplied diff for introduced behavioral and contract defects. Use only when dispatched by the code-review skill.

srtab/daiv · 26 tokens

code-reviewer

Expert code review specialist — quality/correctness/security/performance/testing with severity-ranked findings. Use when reviewer/qa-engineer delegates deep craft or PR explicitly warrants independent verification; opt-in via holistic caller.

ulises-jeremias/agent-toolkit · 45 tokens