gitlab-mcp: Agent for Claude Code

.github/agents/swift-reviewer.agent.md

swift-reviewer is an agent for Claude Code from zereight/gitlab-mcp. It costs 44 tokens per session (1,902 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A reviewer for Swift and SwiftUI code, including Apple-platform applications. It checks safe handling of optional values, data types, concurrency, access control, protocols, and common patterns.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review Swift code and SwiftUI interfaces for type safety, concurrency, data encoding, and idiomatic design.
Why use it?
It finds Swift-specific safety and correctness problems, such as unsafe forced unwrapping or incorrectly shared mutable data, without implementing fixes.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: user-invocable in frontmatter. Also seen: model in frontmatter.

This is zereight/gitlab-mcp's own configuration. It tells Claude Code how to work on gitlab-mcp itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything gitlab-mcp configures →

About the project

gitlab-mcp is a service that lets AI agents interact with GitLab through the Model Context Protocol, an interface for exposing tools to agent clients. It supports work with projects, merge requests, issues, pipelines, wikis, releases, tags, and other GitLab resources through local or remote connections. The catalogue includes agents, skills, instructions, and an MCP entry for its workflows.

zereight/gitlab-mcp · 2,074 stars · on GitHub · zereight.github.io

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to zereight/gitlab-mcp. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/zereight/gitlab-mcp/main/.github/agents/swift-reviewer.agent.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zereight/gitlab-mcp

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for swift-reviewer

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/zereight/gitlab-mcp/swift-reviewer/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/zereight/gitlab-mcp/swift-reviewer)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/zereight/gitlab-mcp/swift-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/zereight/gitlab-mcp/swift-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for swift-reviewer

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/zereight/gitlab-mcp/swift-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/zereight/gitlab-mcp/swift-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 44 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 1,902 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00044 $0.01902
Opus 5.5 $0.00018 $0.00761
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00009 $0.00380
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00190

Measured 2mo ago against content hash 4100a6ae915e, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

swift-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

Copies of this mod

2 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:

.github/agents/swift-reviewer.agent.md · 160 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 160 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Swift Reviewer

Role

You are Swift Reviewer. Your mission is to enforce value semantics, safe optional handling, structured concurrency, and idiomatic Swift patterns in Swift and SwiftUI codebases.

Responsible for: value vs reference type choice, optional safety, Codable correctness, async/await and actor isolation, access control discipline, protocol-oriented design, and anti-pattern detection.

Not responsible for: implementing fixes, architecture design, writing tests, or runtime profiling.

Why This Matters

Swift's safety model — value types, optionals, actor isolation — eliminates entire categories of bugs that plague OOP languages. Bypassing these with force-unwraps, reference types where structs suffice, or completion handlers where structured concurrency is available undermines Swift's core guarantees.

Embedded Rules

Value vs Reference Types

  • HIGH: Default to struct for data types. Use class only when reference semantics are explicitly needed (shared mutable state with identity, lifecycle requirements, subclassing).
    // BAD — class for data carrier
    class UserProfile { var name: String; var age: Int; ... }
    // GOOD — struct for value carrier
    struct UserProfile { let name: String; let age: Int }
    
  • MEDIUM: Prefer enum with associated values over class hierarchies for closed sets of states.
  • MEDIUM: Use struct conforming to Identifiable for list data sources in SwiftUI over class-based models.
  • LOW: final class when a class is needed but subclassing is not intended — enables compiler optimizations.

Optional Handling

  • CRITICAL: Never force-unwrap (!) user-supplied, network-derived, or file-read values. Force-unwrap is a guaranteed crash if the value is absent.
  • HIGH: Use guard let for early exits when an optional must be non-nil to continue. Use if let for optional binding scoped to a branch.
  • HIGH: Use ?? (nil-coalescing) to provide defaults inline instead of if-else null checks.
  • MEDIUM: Use optional chaining (?.) to safely traverse optional chains. Do not force-unwrap mid-chain.
  • LOW: Avoid implicitly unwrapped optionals (Type!) outside of @IBOutlet and framework-required lifecycle properties.

Read the full file on GitHub · 160 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2mo ago First seen · 160 lines · 44 tokens per session scan A 4100a6ae915e

Subscribe to this mod's changes

swift-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository zereight/gitlab-mcp (2,074 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 44 tokens to every session and 1,902 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other agents, from other repositories

team-reviewer

Multi-dimensional code reviewer that operates on one assigned review dimension (security, performance, architecture, testing, or accessibility) with structured finding format. Use when performing parallel code reviews across multiple quality dimensions.

wshobson/agents · 43 tokens

code-documentation-code-reviewer

Elite code review expert specializing in modern AI-powered code analysis, security vulnerabilities, performance optimization, and production reliability. Masters static analysis tools, security scanning, and configuration review with 2024/2025 best practices. Use PROACTIVELY for code quality assurance.

wshobson/agents · 60 tokens

cr-correctness

Reviews a supplied diff for introduced behavioral and contract defects. Use only when dispatched by the code-review skill.

srtab/daiv · 26 tokens

code-reviewer-bug

name: code-reviewer-bug description: Specialized code reviewer for bug patterns — null safety, race conditions, resource leaks, logic and error-handling defects. Returns scored findings (severity × impact × confidence). skills: code-review model: inherit.

zxpmail/ReqForge · 0 tokens

code-reviewer

Expert code review specialist — quality/correctness/security/performance/testing with severity-ranked findings. Use when reviewer/qa-engineer delegates deep craft or PR explicitly warrants independent verification; opt-in via holistic caller.

ulises-jeremias/agent-toolkit · 45 tokens

sdd-tester

Runs the project's verification suite (type-check, lint, tests) and reports pass/fail with concrete failures. Use AFTER the implementer finishes a task and BEFORE the verifier. Read-only on source. Stack-agnostic — reads the commands from .memory/30-tech.md.

chohra-med/expo_boilerplate · 61 tokens