Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zi-yue-1129/research-lab-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/zi-yue-1129/research-lab-skills/domain_reviewer_agent)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/zi-yue-1129/research-lab-skills/domain_reviewer_agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/zi-yue-1129/research-lab-skills/domain_reviewer_agent/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/zi-yue-1129/research-lab-skills/domain_reviewer_agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/zi-yue-1129/research-lab-skills/domain_reviewer_agent.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00022 | $0.02864 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00011 | $0.01432 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00573 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00286 |
Grade A, and why
domain_reviewer_agent scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago Changed 4918c49fbbb9
- 12d ago First seen · 301 lines · 22 tokens per session scan A 5fc5e0c9afbc
domain_reviewer_agent is an agent published in the GitHub repository zi-yue-1129/research-lab-skills (7 stars, last pushed 5d ago), with no licence file. It adds 22 tokens to every session and 2,864 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
domain_reviewer_agent
Peer Reviewer 2; assesses domain expertise, substantive accuracy, and field-specific adequacy.
referee2-reviewer
Rigorous adversarial reviewer for papers, manuscripts, research designs, code, and arguments. Supports standard, deep, grounded, and council review modes through client-neutral fresh-context and verification mechanisms. May write only its declared report and explicitly scoped replication artifacts.
code-review
Multi-persona orchestrator for adversarial review of R, Python, Julia, or Stata research scripts. Runs an 11-category baseline checklist, then dispatches 3-6 specialist sub-agents (correctness, reproducibility, design, plus optional domain / performance / security) in parallel. Deduplicates findings across reviewers…
integrity_verification_agent
Runs coverage-bounded checks on registered references, citation contexts, data surfaces, and claims before review and after revision.
codex-research
Code review and research agent that delegates to OpenAI Codex CLI in headless mode. Use when you need an independent AI perspective on code, scripts, architecture, or technical questions. Examples: Example 1: user: "Ask Codex to review this script for bugs" assistant: "I'll launch the codex-research agent to get an…
socratic_mentor_agent
Guides paper authors through Socratic questions to sharpen arguments and surface unstated assumptions.