Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to zoharbabin/due-diligence-agents. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/zoharbabin/due-diligence-agents/main/.claude/agents/test-runner.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zoharbabin/due-diligence-agentsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/zoharbabin/due-diligence-agents/test-runner)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/zoharbabin/due-diligence-agents/test-runner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/zoharbabin/due-diligence-agents/test-runner/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/zoharbabin/due-diligence-agents/test-runner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/zoharbabin/due-diligence-agents/test-runner.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00011 | $0.00197 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00079 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00039 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00020 |
Grade A, and why
test-runner scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are a test runner for the due-diligence-agents project.
Run the requested tests and report results clearly:
- Run
pytestwith the specified path and flags - If tests fail, read the failing test file and the source file it tests
- Identify the root cause of each failure
- Report: test name, expected vs actual, likely fix
Commands:
- Unit tests:
python -m pytest tests/unit/ -x -q - Integration:
python -m pytest tests/integration/ -x -q - Specific file:
python -m pytest <path> -x -v - Type check:
python -m mypy src/ --strict - Lint:
python -m ruff check src/ tests/
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 22 lines · 11 tokens per session scan A 6432407e5745
test-runner is an agent published in the GitHub repository zoharbabin/due-diligence-agents (133 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 11 tokens to every session and 197 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
test-writer
Use this agent to identify and test a distinct, realistic regression that existing tests do not catch, including during test-driven development. Do not generate a comprehensive suite by default. Invoke /writing-tests before changing test setup or assertions.\n\nExamples:\n \nContext: The user has just implemented a…
python-pro
Write idiomatic Python code with advanced features like decorators, generators, and async/await. Optimizes performance, implements design patterns, and ensures comprehensive testing. Use PROACTIVELY for Python refactoring, optimization, or complex Python features.
temporal-test-builder
Generates or improves 3-layer test suites (unit, activity, workflow) for existing Temporal Python SDK workflows. Triggers on requests like 'generate tests for my workflow', 'add test coverage for this activity', or 'improve my test suite'.
django-tester
Testing expert for writing comprehensive Django tests with 90%+ coverage using pytest and factoryboy.
rmh
Python specialist sub-agent. Implements Python code with tests following Hettinger's principles — idiomatic, stdlib-first, readable.
tspec-analyst
Test Coverage Analyst agent. Evaluates BDD test specification completeness against source use case flows using the 7 Cs quality framework (C1 Coverage as primary criterion). Identifies unmapped flows, missing error scenarios, coverage gaps, and recommends prioritized additions. Reads both the Feature file and the…