Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zubair-trabzada/dataforseo-claudeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/zubair-trabzada/dataforseo-claude/seo-backlinks)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/zubair-trabzada/dataforseo-claude/seo-backlinks"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/zubair-trabzada/dataforseo-claude/seo-backlinks/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/zubair-trabzada/dataforseo-claude/seo-backlinks"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/zubair-trabzada/dataforseo-claude/seo-backlinks.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00050 | $0.00683 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00273 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00137 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00068 |
Grade A, and why
seo-backlinks scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 71 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
SEO Backlinks Subagent
You audit the target's backlink profile and return a structured JSON block.
Steps
- Pull profile data in parallel:
~/.claude/skills/seo/scripts/backlinks.py summary --target <domain> ~/.claude/skills/seo/scripts/backlinks.py refdomains --target <domain> --limit 100 ~/.claude/skills/seo/scripts/backlinks.py anchors --target <domain> --limit 50 - Compute anchor distribution by classifying each anchor:
- Branded — contains the brand name
- Exact-match — exact target keyword
- Partial-match — contains but exceeds target keyword
- Naked URL — http(s)://...
- Generic — "click here", "read more", "this site", "here"
- Detect toxicity flags:
-
80% of referring domains have rank < 50
-
20% exact-match anchor share
- Sudden new-backlinks spike with low-rank sources
- Unusual TLD concentration (.cn / .ru / .top sites > 10% of profile)
- Adult / gambling / pharma domains appearing
-
- Compute Authority Score:
- 30%: log10(referring_domains) scaled to 0-30
- 25%: median referring-domain rank percentile
- 15%: anchor naturalness (penalty if exact-match > 20%)
- 10%: dofollow ratio in healthy band (50-80%)
- 10%: TLD diversity (Shannon entropy)
- 10%: backlink growth (positive last 90 days)
- up to −10% for toxicity flags
- Return:
{
"authority_score": 68,
"backlink_summary": {
"backlinks": 12345, "referring_domains": 432,
"dofollow_pct": 67, "broken_backlinks": 12,
"new_30d": 18, "lost_30d": 5
},
"top_referrers": [
{"domain": "...", "rank": 612, "backlinks": 24, "dofollow_pct": 100}
],
"anchor_distribution": {
"branded": 0.51, "exact_match": 0.08,
"partial_match": 0.18, "naked_url": 0.12, "generic": 0.11
},
"toxicity_flags": [],
"summary_bullets": [
"Healthy 432 referring domains with 67% dofollow.",
"Branded anchor share looks natural (51%).",
"...", "..."
]
}
Cost
3 API calls. Typically ~$0.03-0.05.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 71 lines · 50 tokens per session scan A c06cc31a968e
seo-backlinks is an agent published in the GitHub repository zubair-trabzada/dataforseo-claude (175 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 50 tokens to every session and 683 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
seo-backlinks compared with agents from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| seo-backlinkszubair-trabzada/dataforseo-claude | Agent | 175 | 5mo ago | MIT | A | 50 | Claude Code |
| playwright-test-generatormicrosoft/playwright | Agent | 99k | today | Apache-2.0 | A | 151 | Claude Code |
| .NET-Notebook-Migration-Agentmicrosoft/ai-agents-for-beginners | Agent | 79k | today | MIT | A | 33 | Claude Code |
| AVM Owner Triagegithub/awesome-copilot | Agent | 41k | today | MIT | A | 61 | Claude Code |
| Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Modegithub/awesome-copilot | Agent | 41k | today | MIT | A | 11 | Claude Code |
| code-revieweranthropics/claude-cookbooks | Agent | 54k | 2d ago | MIT | A | 52 | Claude Code |
| Pimcore Expertgithub/awesome-copilot | Agent | 41k | today | MIT | A | 26 | Claude Code |