Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/0xhimanshu/governor/benchmarkgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/0xhimanshu/governorWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/0xhimanshu/governor/benchmark)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/0xhimanshu/governor/benchmark"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/0xhimanshu/governor/benchmark.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00763 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00381 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00153 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00076 |
Grade A, and why
benchmark scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Governor Benchmark
Use this command when the user wants an actual Governor vs Caveman performance comparison or wants to run the V2 benchmark suite.
If the user says /governor:benchmark refresh-caveman, refresh captured
Caveman comparator files first, then rerun the V2 suite:
python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/capture_fixture_conditions.py" \
--condition caveman \
--model sonnet \
--write-summary "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/benchmarks/captured/caveman/latest-summary.json"
python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/run_benchmark.py" \
--write-json "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/benchmarks/v2-fixture-results.json" \
--write-md "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/benchmarks/v2-fixture-results.md"
If capture refresh reports claude-auth-unavailable, stop and explain that the
benchmark can only use inline fallback comparators until Claude CLI is logged in.
If the user says /governor:benchmark refresh-governor, refresh the replayable
Governor comparator files for reference-style fixtures, then rerun the V2 suite:
python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/capture_fixture_conditions.py" \
--condition governor \
--model sonnet \
--write-summary "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/benchmarks/captured/governor/latest-summary.json"
python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/run_benchmark.py" \
--write-json "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/benchmarks/v2-fixture-results.json" \
--write-md "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/benchmarks/v2-fixture-results.md"
If the user provides a CSV path, run:
python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/compare_benchmarks.py" "${CSV_PATH}"
If no CSV is provided, run the V2 fixture suite:
python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/run_benchmark.py" \
--write-json "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/benchmarks/v2-fixture-results.json" \
--write-md "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/benchmarks/v2-fixture-results.md"
If the user explicitly wants live Caveman captures and Claude CLI auth is available, refresh them first:
python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/capture_fixture_conditions.py" \
--condition caveman \
--model sonnet \
--write-summary "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/benchmarks/captured/caveman/latest-summary.json"
Then explain the protocol from benchmarks/README.md:
- Run
python3 scripts/run_benchmark.pyfor the fixture-based V2 suite. - Compare the same fixture inputs under
control,caveman, andgovernor. - Use fresh sessions, the same model, the same repo commit, and exact prompt text when using model-judged evaluations.
- Track VCLR, decision preservation, wrong-decision rate, and token savings in that order.
- Treat inline comparator text as framework-grade only; captured Caveman files are needed for publishable head-to-head claims.
Keep the response practical. Do not claim Governor beats Caveman until the CSV contains measured runs. Token savings are a win only when success rate, requirement coverage, quality score, and verification evidence are retained. For coding benchmarks, call out runtime/selector/event-handler bugs as quality regressions even if output tokens drop.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 80 lines · 11 tokens per session scan A a420187d9f0e
benchmark is a command published in the GitHub repository 0xhimanshu/governor (133 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 11 tokens to every session and 763 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
benchmark
Run a TAU-bench evaluation end-to-end and present results.
list-branches
List project branches with their worktree status.
remove-branch
Remove a branch and its associated worktree.
/release
Release a new version — updates CHANGELOG, pyproject.toml, creates git tag, and pushes.
generate-rfcs
Break the PRD into sequential implementation RFCs.
test-strategy
Generate a test plan from features and RFCs.