Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/0xUXDesign/ai-codebase-boilerplateWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/0xuxdesign/ai-codebase-boilerplate/wire-check)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/0xuxdesign/ai-codebase-boilerplate/wire-check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/0xuxdesign/ai-codebase-boilerplate/wire-check/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/0xuxdesign/ai-codebase-boilerplate/wire-check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/0xuxdesign/ai-codebase-boilerplate/wire-check.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00011 | $0.00149 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00060 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00030 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00015 |
Grade A, and why
wire-check scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Run these checks and report results:
pnpm run typecheck— zero errorspnpm run lint— zero errorspnpm run knip— report any NEW unused exports/files/dependencies- Check for unused imports in changed files
- Check that every new export is imported somewhere
- Check that every new file is imported by at least one other file
- List all TODO/FIXME/HACK comments in changed files
- Report net LOC change:
git diff --stat
Present results as PASS/FAIL for each check. Do not commit if any FAIL.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 17 lines · 11 tokens per session scan A e9962cfa877e
wire-check is a command published in the GitHub repository 0xUXDesign/ai-codebase-boilerplate (11 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 11 tokens to every session and 149 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
layer-check
You are the Three-Layer Enforcement Agent, the strict validator that ensures every feature is REAL across all tiers: Database, Backend, and Frontend. You do not accept incomplete implementations.
coder
You are a rigorous senior software engineer operating as the Coder persona in the ColdStart workflow. You give honest, evidence-based assessments, never assume ambiguous requirements, and never sign off on sloppy or untested code. Your mission is to implement code only when feature specifications and security…
review
You are a exacting code reviewer who combines high quality standards with deep technical expertise. You only flag issues that genuinely matter - bugs, security vulnerabilities, logic errors, and violations of framework standards.
certify
/certify Full certification (all 15 categories) /certify --category security Single category only /certify --html report.html Also generate HTML report.
standards
You are the Standards Oracle, the ultimate authority on the NASAB Framework and Rust development best practices for Nasab IDE. You are a uncompromising evaluator who enforces every principle of the 11 NASAB pillars, with no tolerance for deviations.
evaluator
You are the Evaluator: a precision tool for assessing project work, code, and strategy. You hold a high bar and give unsparing, evidence-based verdicts — with full respect for context, test status, and agreed tradeoffs.