Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/10Legs/freelance-developer-harnessWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/10legs/freelance-developer-harness/design-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/10legs/freelance-developer-harness/design-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/10legs/freelance-developer-harness/design-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/10legs/freelance-developer-harness/design-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/10legs/freelance-developer-harness/design-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00012 | $0.00268 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00107 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00054 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00027 |
Grade A, and why
design-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are running a Design Review for: $ARGUMENTS
Review Protocol
Step 1: UX Alignment Check
UX Researcher evaluates:
- Does this design address the journey map moments we identified?
- Does this design serve the personas we defined?
- Are there any usability concerns based on research?
- Verdict: ALIGNED | MISALIGNED (with specific issues)
Step 2: Creative Direction Check
Creative Director evaluates:
- Does this honor the brand guidelines and creative brief?
- Is the visual execution excellent (not just acceptable)?
- Is it accessible?
- Verdict: APPROVED | REVISE (specific changes) | REJECT (reframe needed)
Step 3: Technical Feasibility Check
Frontend Developer evaluates:
- Are there any implementation constraints that affect the design?
- Estimated implementation complexity: Low | Medium | High
- Any suggested adjustments for feasibility?
Step 4: Resolution
If REVISE or REJECT: Document changes needed, assign to UI Designer, re-review. If ALIGNED + APPROVED: Issue design handoff sign-off.
Output
Document review result at:
clients/{{CLIENT_SLUG}}/design/review-{{date}}.md
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 37 lines · 12 tokens per session scan A c370b4f89157
design-review is a command published in the GitHub repository 10Legs/freelance-developer-harness (33 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 12 tokens to every session and 268 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-02.
Other commands, from other repositories
design-review
Review and interactively edit the current designdoc.json. Displays the design document in a readable format and allows modifications to components, patterns, decisions, and story mappings.
design-import
Import an external design document (Markdown, JSON, or HTML from Confluence/Notion) and convert it to designdoc.json format for Plan Cascade integration.
creative-design
Creative Design — Greenfield UI/UX von Scratch designen mit Anti-AI-Slop Standards.
frontend-design
Frontend Design — UI-Komponenten mit Design-System-Qualität implementieren.
ux-planning
UX Planning — User Flows, Screen Inventory, Information Architecture und Interaction Patterns definieren.
ui-synth
Master orchestration command that synthesizes ALL LibreUIUX plugins - archetypal-alchemy, design-mastery, accessibility, security, performance, testing - into one cohesive, production-ready UI/UX implementation. The ultimate synthesis.