Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to 2SSK/dot-files. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/2SSK/dot-files/main/.claude/commands/go.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/2SSK/dot-filesWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/2ssk/dot-files/go)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/2ssk/dot-files/go"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/2ssk/dot-files/go/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/2ssk/dot-files/go"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/2ssk/dot-files/go.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00003 | $0.00063 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00025 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00013 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00006 |
Grade A, and why
go scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 14d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Run the Go development workflow:
- go fmt ./...
- go vet ./...
- golangci-lint run
- go test -race -v ./...
- go build -o bin/app ./cmd/...
Report results for each step.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 14d ago First seen · 12 lines · 3 tokens per session scan A 70cf9c19d420
go is a command published in the GitHub repository 2SSK/dot-files (250 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 3 tokens to every session and 63 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-02.
Other commands, from other repositories
go-test
Go TDD workflow with table-driven tests.
go-test
Enforce TDD workflow for Go. Write table-driven tests first, then implement. Verify 80%+ coverage with go test -cover.
check-go
Run Go code quality checks including formatting, linting, vetting, and tests.
go-test
Go TDD workflow with table-driven tests.
go-test
Go TDD workflow with table-driven tests.
gopher-feat
Full-cycle Go 1.24+ development: analysis → design → TDD implementation → quality gates → review. Scale-adaptive with 2 stop points.