Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/abderrahimghazali/hivemind/second-opiniongit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/abderrahimghazali/hivemindWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/abderrahimghazali/hivemind/second-opinion)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/abderrahimghazali/hivemind/second-opinion"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/abderrahimghazali/hivemind/second-opinion.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00010 | $0.00355 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00178 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00071 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00036 |
Grade A, and why
second-opinion scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are consulting Codex (an OpenAI coding agent running in a sibling session on this machine) for a second opinion. Codex will give independent technical judgment, not passive agreement.
Steps:
-
Call
mcp__hivemind__peersonce to confirm Codex is online. Ifonlineis false orwarningsincludesunsupported_session_picker, surface the exact error to the user (with the relaunch hint it returns) and stop. -
Send the user's question to Codex via
mcp__hivemind__ask_codexwithwait_ms: 60000. The tool blocks until Codex finishes the turn or the wait elapses, and returns Codex's reply directly. You do not need to poll afterwards in the normal case. -
If
ask_codexreturnstimed_out: true, callmcp__hivemind__wait_for_codexwithtimeout_ms: 30000once more before giving up. -
Present a concise comparison:
- Codex's answer: quote the substance.
- My independent view: state your own reasoning, then explicitly call out where you agree and where you disagree with Codex.
- Recommendation: one or two sentences synthesizing both views, or a clear flag if the disagreement is unresolved.
Question: $ARGUMENTS
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 23 lines · 10 tokens per session scan A 82c2d5956ad2
second-opinion is a command published in the GitHub repository abderrahimghazali/hivemind (2 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 10 tokens to every session and 355 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.