Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Abhinavbwj/AEC-ScholarWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/abhinavbwj/aec-scholar/cover-letter)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/abhinavbwj/aec-scholar/cover-letter"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/abhinavbwj/aec-scholar/cover-letter/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/abhinavbwj/aec-scholar/cover-letter"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/abhinavbwj/aec-scholar/cover-letter.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00010 | $0.00357 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00179 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00071 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00036 |
Grade A, and why
cover-letter scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Draft a submission cover letter for: $ARGUMENTS
Use the academic-writer agent and academic-writing + aec-journals.
Write a concise, professional letter (typically ≤1 page) addressed to the Editor-in-Chief that:
-
Opens with the manuscript title, type (research article / review / etc.), and the journal it's submitted to.
-
States the contribution in 2–4 sentences: the problem, the gap, what the paper does, and the key finding — framed for why it fits this journal's scope and readership (use
aec-journalsscope notes). -
Makes the significance explicit — scholarly and practical/industry relevance (AEC editors value both).
-
Includes the standard declarations: the work is original, not under consideration elsewhere, all authors approve submission, and any conflicts of interest / funding / prior-related-work (e.g. a conference version that this extends) are disclosed. Add a data-availability note if relevant.
-
Optionally suggests suitable (non-conflicted) reviewers or notes excluded reviewers, if the journal invites this.
-
Closes courteously with corresponding-author contact details.
Keep it specific to the actual manuscript and journal — no generic boilerplate, no over-claiming. Mark placeholders (author names, grant numbers, prior version DOI) for the user to fill. Don't fabricate any declaration; if you don't know whether a conference version exists, ask.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 33 lines · 10 tokens per session scan A 2183e626b452
cover-letter is a command published in the GitHub repository Abhinavbwj/AEC-Scholar (18 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 10 tokens to every session and 357 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
clarify
Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.
specify
Create or update the feature specification from a natural language feature description.
analyze
Perform a non-destructive cross-artifact consistency and quality analysis across spec.md, plan.md, and tasks.md after task generation.
converge
Assess the current codebase against the feature's spec, plan, and tasks, then append any remaining unbuilt work as new tasks to tasks.md so implement can complete it.
implement
Execute the implementation plan by processing and executing all tasks defined in tasks.md.