Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/abinauv/business-consultingWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/abinauv/business-consulting/org-design)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/abinauv/business-consulting/org-design"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/abinauv/business-consulting/org-design.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00007 | $0.00408 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00204 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00001 | $0.00082 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00041 |
Grade A, and why
org-design scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Organizational Design Assessment
Assess organizational structure and recommend improvements for $ARGUMENTS.
Instructions
1. Current State Assessment
Structure Analysis:
- Current org chart structure (functional, divisional, matrix, flat)
- Number of management layers (CEO to front line)
- Average spans of control by level
- Benchmark against peers of similar size
Efficiency Metrics:
- Revenue per employee (vs. peers)
- Management overhead ratio (managers / total headcount)
- Support function ratio (support FTEs / total FTEs)
- Duplicate roles or functions across business units
Decision-Making:
- Where do key decisions get made? (centralized vs. decentralized)
- Average decision cycle time for key processes
- Escalation patterns (how many levels for common decisions?)
2. Gap Identification
Spans & Layers Issues:
- Layers that are too deep (>7 for companies <10K employees)
- Spans that are too narrow (<4 direct reports) — management bloat
- Single-report managers ("totem poles")
Structural Misalignments:
- Strategy says X but the org is designed for Y
- Functions that should be centralized but aren't (or vice versa)
- Missing capabilities or functions
- Unclear RACI for key processes
3. Design Options
Present 2-3 structural alternatives with trade-offs:
| Design Option | Pros | Cons | Best For |
|---|
4. Recommended Design
- Proposed org structure (describe the changes)
- Target spans and layers
- RACI clarifications for key processes
- Shared services opportunities
- Expected headcount impact and cost savings
5. Implementation Approach
- Phased transition plan
- Change management requirements
- Communication plan outline
- Risks and mitigation strategies
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 62 lines · 7 tokens per session scan A a8b71b03434e
org-design is a command published in the GitHub repository abinauv/business-consulting (28 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 7 tokens to every session and 408 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
diagnose-underperformer
Diagnose why a specific Google Ads or Meta Ads campaign / ad set / ad is underperforming and prescribe the next concrete action. Use when the user says something like "why is X not converting?", "this campaign is wasting money", or "why are impressions so low?". Read-only — no changes are made.
edit-meta-creative
Edit a Meta ad's creative content — landing page URL, primary text, headline, description, CTA, link description — across one ad or many. Use when the user says "change the URL on my ads", "update the copy", "swap the CTA", or anything that changes what an existing Meta ad shows. Meta does not allow in-place creative…
launch-google-search
Launch a complete Google Ads Search campaign — campaign, ad group, responsive search ads, keywords, sitelinks, callouts, and negatives — built paused and ready to review. Use when the user wants to spin up a new Search campaign on Google Ads.
launch-meta-campaign
Launch a complete Meta Ads campaign — campaign, ad set, and ad(s) — built paused and ready to review. Use when the user wants a new Facebook/Instagram campaign.
launch-pmax
Launch a Google Ads Performance Max campaign with a complete asset group, audience signals, and (for ecom) listing groups. Built paused for review. Use when the user wants a new PMax campaign.
negative-keyword-sweep
Find wasted spend in Google Ads search terms and add negatives at the right scope (account list, campaign, or ad group). Use when the user says "find junk keywords", "stop wasting on bad searches", or wants a search-terms cleanup.