Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/abossenbroek/abossenbroek-claude-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/abossenbroek/abossenbroek-claude-plugins/redteam)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/abossenbroek/abossenbroek-claude-plugins/redteam"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/abossenbroek/abossenbroek-claude-plugins/redteam/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/abossenbroek/abossenbroek-claude-plugins/redteam"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/abossenbroek/abossenbroek-claude-plugins/redteam.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00013 | $0.00868 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00434 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00174 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00087 |
Grade A, and why
redteam scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 137 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/redteam Command
Adversarial red team analysis of the current conversation or specified target.
Usage
/redteam [mode] [target]
Arguments
mode (optional):
quick- Fast 2-3 vector analysis, skip groundingstandard- Balanced 5-6 vectors with basic grounding (default)deep- All categories + meta-analysis with full groundingfocus:[category]- Deep dive on specific category (e.g.,focus:reasoning-flaws)
target (optional):
conversation- Current conversation context (default)file:path- Analyze specific filecode- Analyze recent git changes
Instructions
You are the MINIMAL entry point for red team analysis. Your ONLY job is to:
- Check PAL MCP availability (optional enhancement)
- Parse the mode and target from arguments
- Extract a structured context snapshot
- Launch the red-team-coordinator agent with the snapshot
- Return the coordinator's output directly to the user
Step 1: Check PAL Availability (Non-Blocking)
Launch the pal-availability-checker agent to detect if PAL MCP is available:
Task: Launch pal-availability-checker agent
Agent: agents/pal-availability-checker.md
Prompt: Check if PAL MCP is available and list models
Parse the YAML result and include pal_available: true/false in the snapshot.
This step is NON-BLOCKING - continue regardless of result. PAL is optional.
Step 2: Parse Arguments
Determine mode and target from the command arguments:
- Default mode:
standard - Default target:
conversation
Step 3: Extract Context Snapshot
Create a YAML-formatted snapshot of the current session. DO NOT include raw conversation - structure it as data:
snapshot:
mode: [parsed mode]
target: [parsed target]
pal_available: [true/false from Step 1]
pal_models: [list of models if available, empty if not]
conversational_arc:
message_count: [count of messages in conversation]
phases:
- phase: "[phase name]"
messages: [range]
summary: "[what happened in this phase]"
key_transitions:
- from_msg: [number]
to_msg: [number]
note: "[what changed and why]"
early_assumptions_carried_forward:
- assumption: "[assumption text]"
introduced_at: [message number]
still_active: [true/false]
claims:
- id: C[N]
text: "[factual claim made by assistant]"
speaker: assistant
confidence: [stated_as_fact|hedged|uncertain]
message_num: [source message number]
files_read:
- path: [file path]
summary: "[brief description of content/purpose]"
tools_invoked:
- tool: [tool name]
command: "[command or action]"
outcome: "[result summary]"
decisions:
- decision: "[decision made]"
rationale: "[stated reason]"
assumptions_explicit:
- "[explicitly stated assumption]"
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 137 lines · 13 tokens per session scan A e00deb78044a
redteam is a command published in the GitHub repository abossenbroek/abossenbroek-claude-plugins (2 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed BSD-3-Clause. It adds 13 tokens to every session and 868 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
clarify
Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.
specify
Create or update the feature specification from a natural language feature description.
analyze
Perform a non-destructive cross-artifact consistency and quality analysis across spec.md, plan.md, and tasks.md after task generation.
converge
Assess the current codebase against the feature's spec, plan, and tasks, then append any remaining unbuilt work as new tasks to tasks.md so implement can complete it.
implement
Execute the implementation plan by processing and executing all tasks defined in tasks.md.