Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Ad-Superpowers/ad-superpowers-pluginWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/ad-superpowers/ad-superpowers-plugin/b2b-pipeline-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/ad-superpowers/ad-superpowers-plugin/b2b-pipeline-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/ad-superpowers/ad-superpowers-plugin/b2b-pipeline-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/ad-superpowers/ad-superpowers-plugin/b2b-pipeline-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/ad-superpowers/ad-superpowers-plugin/b2b-pipeline-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00028 | $0.00630 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00315 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00126 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00063 |
Grade A, and why
b2b-pipeline-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 69 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
B2B Pipeline Review
Perform a B2B lead generation pipeline review focused on lead quality and cost efficiency.
Step 1: Gather Lead Gen Data
LinkedIn Ads:
linkedin_list_ad_accounts→linkedin_get_analyticsfor lead metricslinkedin_queryfor campaign-level lead form performance- Key metrics: leads, CPL, lead form completion rate, cost per qualified lead
Google Ads:
google_ads_run_gaqlfor lead gen campaigns:SELECT campaign.name, metrics.conversions, metrics.cost_per_conversion, metrics.conversions_value FROM campaign WHERE campaign.advertising_channel_type = 'SEARCH' AND segments.date DURING LAST_30_DAYS
GA4:
ga4_run_reportfor website lead behavior: form submissions, demo requests, content downloads
Step 2: Lead Volume & Cost Analysis
| Platform | Leads | CPL | Budget | Trend (vs prev period) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ... | ... | ... | ... | |
| Google Ads Search | ... | ... | ... | ... |
| Google Ads Display | ... | ... | ... | ... |
| Total | ... | ... | ... | ... |
Step 3: Lead Quality Assessment
If CRM data is available, analyze:
- MQL → SQL conversion rate (benchmark: 20-30%)
- SQL → Opportunity rate (benchmark: 40-60%)
- Opportunity → Closed Won rate (benchmark: 15-25%)
- Average deal size from ad-sourced leads
- Cost per SQL (the true efficiency metric)
If no CRM data, assess quality signals:
- Form completion rates (higher = lower friction but potentially lower quality)
- Time on site after lead submission
- Return visit rate of leads
- LinkedIn audience quality (seniority level, company size)
Step 4: Platform Comparison
| Metric | Google Ads | Benchmark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CPL | ... | ... | LinkedIn: €30-150, Google: €15-80 |
| Lead Quality | ... | ... | LinkedIn typically higher quality |
| Volume | ... | ... | Google typically higher volume |
| Best for | ... | ... | ... |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 69 lines · 28 tokens per session scan A 33190ad2c765
b2b-pipeline-review is a command published in the GitHub repository Ad-Superpowers/ad-superpowers-plugin (5 stars, last pushed 11d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 28 tokens to every session and 630 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
meta-audit
Full Meta Ads account audit, tailored to ecommerce or lead-gen automatically.
audit
Google Ads command — audit.
logout
Google Ads command — logout.
status
Google Ads command — status.
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
clarify
Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.