Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/adidacta/pmf-detectiveWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/adidacta/pmf-detective/generate-assets)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/adidacta/pmf-detective/generate-assets"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/adidacta/pmf-detective/generate-assets/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/adidacta/pmf-detective/generate-assets"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/adidacta/pmf-detective/generate-assets.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00008 | $0.00349 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00140 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00070 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00035 |
Grade A, and why
generate-assets scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Generate Assets
Generate marketing assets based on your PMF context layer.
Available Asset Types
landing- Generate a React + Vite landing page
Instructions
The user invoked this command with: $ARGUMENTS
-
Parse asset type from arguments
-
Check that required PMF context files exist:
pmf/icp.md- Who your customer ispmf/value-prop.md- Why they should carepmf/mvp.md- MVP scope & features
-
If prerequisites missing:
To generate [asset type], I need your PMF context layer. Missing: [ ] pmf/icp.md [✓] pmf/value-prop.md [ ] pmf/mvp.md Use /plan-pmf to build your context layer first. -
If prerequisites met, read the PMF context files and generate assets using the landing-generator skill.
Asset Generation
Landing Page
Read:
pmf/icp.md- For targeting and languagepmf/value-prop.md- For hero copy, Callout + Magnet messagingpmf/mvp.md- For benefits and proof points
Generate using the landing-generator skill.
If No Argument Provided
Ask the user what they'd like to generate:
What assets would you like to generate?
1. Landing page (React + Vite)
Reply with a number or asset type.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 61 lines · 8 tokens per session scan A 24f7a012e94c
generate-assets is a command published in the GitHub repository adidacta/pmf-detective (18 stars, last pushed 28d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 8 tokens to every session and 349 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
generate-assets compared with commands from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| generate-assetsadidacta/pmf-detective | Command | 18 | 28d ago | MIT | A | 8 | Claude Code |
| checklistgithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| clarifygithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 27 | Claude Code |
| specifygithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| analyzegithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 26 | Claude Code |
| convergegithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 35 | Claude Code |
| implementgithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 14 | Claude Code |