review

review is a command for coding agents from Aedelon/claude-code-blueprint. It costs 8 tokens per session (451 once invoked), scanned A, original, no licence file.

A code-review command that examines selected code or the most recent set of changes.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review highlighted code or check the latest changes before sharing or committing them.
Why use it?
It helps identify issues in code without manually gathering the relevant lines or diff.

Command

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/aedelon/claude-code-blueprint/review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Aedelon/claude-code-blueprint

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/aedelon/claude-code-blueprint/review.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/aedelon/claude-code-blueprint/review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/aedelon/claude-code-blueprint/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/aedelon/claude-code-blueprint/review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 8 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 451 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin unknown No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00008 $0.00451
Opus 5 $0.00004 $0.00226
Sonnet 5 $0.00002 $0.00090
Haiku 4.5 $0.00001 $0.00045

Measured 4d ago against content hash d125be027126, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

commands/review.md · 75 lines

The source is not reproduced here

No licence file

A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.

Read it on GitHub

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 4d ago First seen · 75 lines · 8 tokens per session scan A d125be027126

Subscribe to this mod's changes

review is a command published in the GitHub repository Aedelon/claude-code-blueprint (114 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 8 tokens to every session and 451 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.