Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/aegntic/compound-engineering/triagegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/aegntic/compound-engineeringWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00013 | $0.01969 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00984 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00394 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00197 |
Grade A, and why
triage scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
91% identical to triage — 8 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 314 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
- First set the /model to Haiku
- Then read all pending todos in the todos/ directory
Present all findings, decisions, or issues here one by one for triage. The goal is to go through each item and decide whether to add it to the CLI todo system.
IMPORTANT: DO NOT CODE ANYTHING DURING TRIAGE!
This command is for:
- Triaging code review findings
- Processing security audit results
- Reviewing performance analysis
- Handling any other categorized findings that need tracking
Workflow
Step 1: Present Each Finding
For each finding, present in this format:
---
Issue #X: [Brief Title]
Severity: 🔴 P1 (CRITICAL) / 🟡 P2 (IMPORTANT) / 🔵 P3 (NICE-TO-HAVE)
Category: [Security/Performance/Architecture/Bug/Feature/etc.]
Description:
[Detailed explanation of the issue or improvement]
Location: [file_path:line_number]
Problem Scenario:
[Step by step what's wrong or could happen]
Proposed Solution:
[How to fix it]
Estimated Effort: [Small (< 2 hours) / Medium (2-8 hours) / Large (> 8 hours)]
---
Do you want to add this to the todo list?
1. yes - create todo file
2. next - skip this item
3. custom - modify before creating
Step 2: Handle User Decision
When user says "yes":
-
Update existing todo file (if it exists) or Create new filename:
If todo already exists (from code review):
- Rename file from
{id}-pending-{priority}-{desc}.md→{id}-ready-{priority}-{desc}.md - Update YAML frontmatter:
status: pending→status: ready - Keep issue_id, priority, and description unchanged
If creating new todo:
{next_id}-ready-{priority}-{brief-description}.mdPriority mapping:
- 🔴 P1 (CRITICAL) →
p1 - 🟡 P2 (IMPORTANT) →
p2 - 🔵 P3 (NICE-TO-HAVE) →
p3
Example:
042-ready-p1-transaction-boundaries.md - Rename file from
-
Update YAML frontmatter:
--- status: ready # IMPORTANT: Change from "pending" to "ready" priority: p1 # or p2, p3 based on severity issue_id: "042" tags: [category, relevant-tags] dependencies: [] ---
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 314 lines · 13 tokens per session scan A c8b5499e7cfd
triage is a command published in the GitHub repository aegntic/compound-engineering (2 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 13 tokens to every session and 1,969 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 91% identical to triage, differing in 8 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other commands, from other repositories
research
Professional equity research analysis with institutional-grade formatting.
cli-anything-web:list
List all available CLI-Anything-Web CLIs (installed and generated).
pi-code-review
Adversarial code review via Codex — break confidence in changes, not validate them.
review
Run a standard Gemini code review of recent git changes.
pi-ask-gemini
Ask Gemini a question — get Google's perspective alongside Claude's.
brd-reconcile
BRD reconciliation workflow (PM phase, sixth and last command of the BRD-to-PRD route). Takes the customer's returned review from anywhere, copies it into the BRD folder under the canonical name and commits it before anything reads it, then dispatches customer-review-reader in schema or free-text mode. Confirms every…