ECC is a toolkit that organizes and improves how coding agents work through skills, memory, security checks, research practices, and related extensions. It is for developers using agents such as Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, and Cursor.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/affaan-m/ECCWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/affaan-m/ecc/go-test)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/affaan-m/ecc/go-test"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/affaan-m/ecc/go-test/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/affaan-m/ecc/go-test"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/affaan-m/ecc/go-test.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00008 | $0.00638 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00255 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00128 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00064 |
Grade A, and why
go-test scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
8 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:
- go-test — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- go-test — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- go-test — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- go-test — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- go-test — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- go-test — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- go-test — 95% identical, 2 lines differ
- go-test — 95% identical, 2 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 132 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Go Test Command
Implement using Go TDD methodology: $ARGUMENTS
Your Task
Apply test-driven development with Go idioms:
- Define types - Interfaces and structs
- Write table-driven tests - Comprehensive coverage
- Implement minimal code - Pass the tests
- Benchmark - Verify performance
TDD Cycle for Go
Step 1: Define Interface
type Calculator interface {
Calculate(input Input) (Output, error)
}
type Input struct {
// fields
}
type Output struct {
// fields
}
Step 2: Table-Driven Tests
func TestCalculate(t *testing.T) {
tests := []struct {
name string
input Input
want Output
wantErr bool
}{
{
name: "valid input",
input: Input{...},
want: Output{...},
},
{
name: "invalid input",
input: Input{...},
wantErr: true,
},
}
for _, tt := range tests {
t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
got, err := Calculate(tt.input)
if (err != nil) != tt.wantErr {
t.Errorf("Calculate() error = %v, wantErr %v", err, tt.wantErr)
return
}
if !reflect.DeepEqual(got, tt.want) {
t.Errorf("Calculate() = %v, want %v", got, tt.want)
}
})
}
}
Step 3: Run Tests (RED)
go test -v ./...
Step 4: Implement (GREEN)
func Calculate(input Input) (Output, error) {
// Minimal implementation
}
Step 5: Benchmark
func BenchmarkCalculate(b *testing.B) {
input := Input{...}
for i := 0; i < b.N; i++ {
Calculate(input)
}
}
Go Testing Commands
# Run all tests
go test ./...
# Run with verbose output
go test -v ./...
# Run with coverage
go test -cover ./...
# Run with race detector
go test -race ./...
# Run benchmarks
go test -bench=. ./...
# Generate coverage report
go test -coverprofile=coverage.out ./...
go tool cover -html=coverage.out
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 132 lines · 8 tokens per session scan A ff270caf17e4
go-test is a command published in the GitHub repository affaan-m/ECC (283,276 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 8 tokens to every session and 638 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other commands, from other repositories
go-test
Go TDD workflow with table-driven tests.
symfony-tdd-pest
Start a TDD workflow using Pest PHP for Symfony with RED-GREEN-REFACTOR cycle.
symfony-tdd-phpunit
Start a TDD workflow using PHPUnit for Symfony with RED-GREEN-REFACTOR cycle.
go-test
Enforce TDD workflow for Go. Write table-driven tests first, then implement. Verify 80%+ coverage with go test -cover.
go-test
A Go testing command that follows test-driven development, or TDD: write a failing test, implement the smallest change that passes it, then improve the code.
go-test
Go TDD workflow with table-driven tests.