Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Agentic-Assets/corbis-literature-starter-kitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/agentic-assets/corbis-literature-starter-kit/idea)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/agentic-assets/corbis-literature-starter-kit/idea"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/agentic-assets/corbis-literature-starter-kit/idea.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00009 | $0.00234 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00117 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00047 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00023 |
Grade A, and why
idea scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Run the finance-idea-screening skill on this idea:
$ARGUMENTS
Steps:
- Run Stage 0 desk-editor screen (four quick questions). If weak, stop early with Revise/Kill.
- Restate the idea in one sentence (question-first framing — not "Using X data...").
- Search for closest papers using
search_papers(do not skip this). - Score on 6 dimensions (question, importance, contribution, mechanism, bridge, data) using the 1-5 rubric.
- Apply decision rules: Top-3 Go (importance>=4, contribution>=4, bridge>=4, no dim<3, <=3 hurdles) / Field-journal Go (all>=3, total>=18) / Revise / Kill.
- Run the three stress tests (null-result value, simultaneous-discovery, syllabus sentence).
- Identify the 2-3 essential hurdles and apply the revision-feasibility rule.
- Recommend contribution tier and describe the killer exhibit.
Produce a complete Idea Card.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 20 lines · 9 tokens per session scan A 005bcc628c8a
idea is a command published in the GitHub repository Agentic-Assets/corbis-literature-starter-kit (11 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 9 tokens to every session and 234 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
xray
Multi-dimensional paper audit — spawns 5 parallel sub-agents to check numerical accuracy, terminology consistency, code-paper alignment, citation accuracy, and evaluation integrity.
fortify
Select strongest ablations and anticipate reviewer questions. Reads paper and experiment results to prepare for peer review.
factcheck
Verify BibTeX entries and cited claims against DBLP and web sources. Checks author names, venues, years, and specific numerical claims.
gaps
Literature gap analysis with web confirmation. Takes a research topic or question and maps existing work to find what's missing.
paper-trail-review
Review and arbitrate problematic references (cascade-exhausted, unresolved UID, awaiting OCR). Generates an up-to-date report, walks through cases by category, and applies arbitration decisions to the registry.
paper-trail-audit-article
Per-citation audit of an academic article (LaTeX or Markdown). Produces RECEIPTS.md classifying each citation as VALID/ADJUST/INVALID/UNVERIFIABLE. Optional --warn inserts inline warnings in a .bak copy of the source.