Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Agentic-Assets/corbis-literature-starter-kitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/agentic-assets/corbis-literature-starter-kit/verify-citations)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/agentic-assets/corbis-literature-starter-kit/verify-citations"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/agentic-assets/corbis-literature-starter-kit/verify-citations/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/agentic-assets/corbis-literature-starter-kit/verify-citations"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/agentic-assets/corbis-literature-starter-kit/verify-citations.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00013 | $0.00100 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00040 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00020 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00010 |
Grade A, and why
verify-citations scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 29d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Run the verify-citations skill for the following file or project:
$ARGUMENTS
Audit the complete .bib file with verify_bibtex, including uncited entries. If a manuscript is present, check its citation keys, including \citet, against that bibliography. Report corrections, unresolved entries, parse errors, missing keys, and unused entries. Do not silently change references.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 29d ago Changed · -7 lines · +8 tokens per session 2b461075f295
- 1mo ago First seen · 17 lines · 5 tokens per session scan A 24211761c94e
verify-citations is a command published in the GitHub repository Agentic-Assets/corbis-literature-starter-kit (11 stars, last pushed 29d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 13 tokens to every session and 100 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
paper-trail-ingest
Ingest the citations of one SOTA into the registry. Extracts bibliographic sections, parses citations via the citation-parser sub-agent, resolves DOI via Crossref/S2, deduplicates against the registry, creates new candidate refs, and substitutes free-text citations with [[wikilinks]]. Required first step to make a…
paper-trail-new-paper
Start writing an academic paper (IMRaD structure) on a topic, with anti-hallucination citation verification at every step. Builds on existing audited SOTAs.
paper-trail-new-sota
Create a new State-of-the-Art review on a topic, guaranteed without hallucinated citations. Inverted workflow (research → acquire PDFs → read → write), refuses to write from memory.
paper-trail-receipts
Local-only per-citation audit (no remote API). Reads the cited PDFs from the local registry, generates RECEIPTS.md. Faster than audit-article (no Crossref / paper-search calls).
lit-review
A command for carrying out a systematic literature review, meaning a structured search and summary of research papers on a chosen topic. It also builds a citation graph showing connections between papers.
cite-check
Verify that citations actually exist and that the claims they support are faithful to the cited source. Runs deterministic existence checks (Crossref / OpenAlex / Semantic Scholar / arXiv) plus a claim-faithfulness pass via the alterlab-citation-verifier skill.