Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/agentii-ai/growth-hacking-kitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/agentii-ai/growth-hacking-kit/implement)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/agentii-ai/growth-hacking-kit/implement"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/agentii-ai/growth-hacking-kit/implement/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/agentii-ai/growth-hacking-kit/implement"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/agentii-ai/growth-hacking-kit/implement.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00014 | $0.02045 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00818 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00409 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00204 |
Grade A, and why
implement scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
94% identical to speckit.implement — 10 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 139 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
User Input
$ARGUMENTS
You MUST consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).
Outline
-
Run
{SCRIPT}from repo root and parse FEATURE_DIR and AVAILABLE_DOCS list. All paths must be absolute. For single quotes in args like "I'm Groot", use escape syntax: e.g 'I'''m Groot' (or double-quote if possible: "I'm Groot"). -
Check checklists status (if FEATURE_DIR/checklists/ exists):
-
Scan all checklist files in the checklists/ directory
-
For each checklist, count:
- Total items: All lines matching
- [ ]or- [X]or- [x] - Completed items: Lines matching
- [X]or- [x] - Incomplete items: Lines matching
- [ ]
- Total items: All lines matching
-
Create a status table:
| Checklist | Total | Completed | Incomplete | Status | |-----------|-------|-----------|------------|--------| | ux.md | 12 | 12 | 0 | ✓ PASS | | test.md | 8 | 5 | 3 | ✗ FAIL | | security.md | 6 | 6 | 0 | ✓ PASS | -
Calculate overall status:
- PASS: All checklists have 0 incomplete items
- FAIL: One or more checklists have incomplete items
-
If any checklist is incomplete:
- Display the table with incomplete item counts
- STOP and ask: "Some checklists are incomplete. Do you want to proceed with implementation anyway? (yes/no)"
- Wait for user response before continuing
- If user says "no" or "wait" or "stop", halt execution
- If user says "yes" or "proceed" or "continue", proceed to step 3
-
If all checklists are complete:
- Display the table showing all checklists passed
- Automatically proceed to step 3
-
-
Load and analyze the implementation context:
- REQUIRED: Read tasks.md for the complete task list and execution plan
- REQUIRED: Read plan.md for tech stack, architecture, and file structure
- IF EXISTS: Read data-model.md for entities and relationships
- IF EXISTS: Read contracts/ for API specifications and test requirements
- IF EXISTS: Read research.md for technical decisions and constraints
- IF EXISTS: Read quickstart.md for integration scenarios
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 139 lines · 14 tokens per session scan A 891b6e713e65
implement is a command published in the GitHub repository agentii-ai/growth-hacking-kit (5 stars, last pushed 9mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 14 tokens to every session and 2,045 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 94% identical to speckit.implement, differing in 10 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other commands, from other repositories
friday
End-of-week close-out. Reviews performance, digests team progress, cleans up project management, and saves session state.
team
Routes to team-manager skill for managing team members and credentials.
saleskit.checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
implement
Execute the implementation plan by processing and executing all tasks defined in tasks.md.
taskstoissues
Convert existing tasks into actionable, dependency-ordered GitHub issues for the feature based on available design artifacts.
template
Manage issue templates for streamlined issue creation.