Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add Agents365-ai/pi-plugin-cc/plugin install piWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/agents365-ai/pi-plugin-cc/adversarial-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/agents365-ai/pi-plugin-cc/adversarial-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/agents365-ai/pi-plugin-cc/adversarial-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/agents365-ai/pi-plugin-cc/adversarial-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/agents365-ai/pi-plugin-cc/adversarial-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00012 | $0.00446 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00223 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00089 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00045 |
Grade A, and why
adversarial-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Run an adversarial Pi review through the shared plugin runtime. Position it as a challenge review that questions the chosen implementation, design choices, tradeoffs, and assumptions. It is not just a stricter pass over implementation defects.
Raw slash-command arguments:
$ARGUMENTS
Core constraint:
- This command is review-only.
- Do not fix issues, apply patches, or suggest that you are about to make changes.
- Your only job is to run the review and return Pi's output verbatim to the user.
- Keep the framing focused on whether the current approach is the right one, what assumptions it depends on, and where the design could fail under real-world conditions.
Execution:
- Run the review in the foreground.
- If there is nothing to review (empty working tree and no base branch diff), say so and skip the review.
/pi:adversarial-reviewuses the same review target selection as/pi:review.- It supports working-tree review, branch review, and
--base <ref>. - It does not support
--scope stagedor--scope unstaged. - Unlike
/pi:review, it can still take extra focus text after the flags. --models <m1,m2,...>(2+ models) runs the adversarial review as a multi-model panel with merged, consensus-ranked findings.
Foreground flow:
- Run:
node "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/pi-companion.mjs" adversarial-review "$ARGUMENTS"
- Return the command stdout verbatim, exactly as-is.
- Do not paraphrase, summarize, or add commentary before or after it.
- Do not fix any issues mentioned in the review output.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 39 lines · 12 tokens per session scan A b6c29ca10b2c
adversarial-review is a command published in the GitHub repository Agents365-ai/pi-plugin-cc (44 stars, last pushed 25d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 12 tokens to every session and 446 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
discover
Run a full product discovery cycle — from outcome definition through opportunity mapping, prioritisation, and experiment design. Use when the team isn't sure what to build next, or before writing a PRD for a complex feature space.
voice-compliance
Voice/telephony compliance check — invokes voice-ai-reviewer to produce TM-voice-{slug}.md with TCPA, STIR/SHAKEN, state recording-consent, EU AI Act Art. 50, and synth-voice deepfake-law gaps.
git
The pre-finish status: branch, hygiene findings, message checks, workflow lint, template state.
init
Install the formatters this repository needs, with every command visible before it runs.
mach12:issue-review
Read a GitHub issue and all comments, review the implementation plan, and present findings.
ia-report-bug
Report a bug in the whetstone plugin.