Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/agents365-ai/pi-plugin-cc/reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Agents365-ai/pi-plugin-ccWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/agents365-ai/pi-plugin-cc/review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/agents365-ai/pi-plugin-cc/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/agents365-ai/pi-plugin-cc/review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00573 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00287 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00115 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00057 |
Grade A, and why
review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Run a Pi review through the shared plugin runtime.
Raw slash-command arguments:
$ARGUMENTS
Core constraint:
- This command is review-only.
- Do not fix issues, apply patches, or suggest that you are about to make changes.
- Your only job is to run the review and return Pi's output verbatim to the user.
Execution:
- Run the review in the foreground.
- If there is nothing to review (empty working tree and no base branch diff), say so and skip the review.
/pi:reviewdoes not accept extra focus text. If the user needs custom review instructions or more adversarial framing, they should use/pi:adversarial-review.--incrementalonly reviews commits since the last review on the current branch (cached per branch); falls back to a full review when there is no valid cache (no prior review, or the cached commit is no longer an ancestor of HEAD, e.g. after a rebase). Not combinable with--base. Composes with--models/--shards.--models <m1,m2,...>(2+ models) runs a multi-model review panel: the same diff is reviewed by every listed model in parallel and the findings are merged, with consensus findings (reported by 2+ models) ranked first.--shards <N>(N >= 2, and only when more than one file changed) splits the changed files across N review jobs that run in parallel, each scoped to only its own files, then merges the findings into one result. Not combinable with--models.--out-file <path>writes the full review to<path>and returns only a short summary (verdict, finding counts, one line per finding) — this keeps a large review out of the conversation's context to save tokens. When it is used, relay the short summary verbatim; the user opens the file for the full detail.
Foreground flow:
- Run:
node "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/pi-companion.mjs" review "$ARGUMENTS"
- Return the command stdout verbatim, exactly as-is.
- Do not paraphrase, summarize, or add commentary before or after it.
- Do not fix any issues mentioned in the review output.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 36 lines · 9 tokens per session scan A 4f9d9cfc518b
review is a command published in the GitHub repository Agents365-ai/pi-plugin-cc (44 stars, last pushed 21d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 9 tokens to every session and 573 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
review
Run a read-only Grok code review of your uncommitted changes or a branch.
search
Search X (Twitter) and the web in real time with Grok, then summarize with sources.
result
Show the final output of a completed Grok job.
kill
Stop a running cli-dispatch worker session.
cancel
Cancel a running background Grok job.
ag-run
Delegate a task to the Antigravity (agy / Gemini) worker.