review-ui

A command for reviewing UI code against a defined checklist. UI means the screens and controls people use.

In plain words
What is it for?
It is for inspecting a selected UI snippet, file, or diff and suggesting up to five targeted improvements.
Why use it?
It shows failed checks in a compact Before–After–Why table, making specific code changes easier to review.

Command

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/agentsorg/design-engineering/review-ui
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/AgentsORG/design-engineering
Per session 29 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 167 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00029 $0.00167
Opus 5 $0.00015 $0.00084
Sonnet 5 $0.00006 $0.00033
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00017

Measured 2d ago against content hash ac04e25b3c4d, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

review-ui scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

commands/review-ui.md · 16 lines

What it actually says

Review UI

Spawn or emulate the ui-reviewer subagent (agents/ui-reviewer.md).

  1. Load skills/design-engineering/references/meta/review-format.md, review-checklist.md, gotchas.md, and pov.md.
  2. Read the UI code the user pointed at (selection, file, or diff).
  3. Return only the Before | After | Why table (three to five rows max). Every Why ends with a [[wikilink]].
  4. If nothing fails the checklist, say so in one sentence.

Do not add prose around the table unless the user asked for narrative.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 16 lines · 29 tokens per session scan A ac04e25b3c4d

Subscribe to this mod's changes

review-ui is a command published in the GitHub repository AgentsORG/design-engineering (21 stars, last pushed 10d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 29 tokens to every session and 167 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.