actual-mcp-server: Command for Claude Code

.claude/commands/full-review.md

full-review is a command for Claude Code from agigante80/actual-mcp-server. It costs 24 tokens per session (4,591 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of full-review, MIT.

A command that coordinates a code review across architecture, security, performance, testing, and coding practices. It runs the review in ordered phases and writes each phase's results to files.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it for a broad review of a codebase covering design, security risks, speed, tests, and general engineering practices.
Why use it?
It organizes several kinds of review and preserves their results, while stopping for approval at defined checkpoints or when a step fails.

Command for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: argument-hint in frontmatter. Also seen: reads .claude/ paths; mentions CLAUDE.md; names the AskUserQuestion tool.

This is agigante80/actual-mcp-server's own configuration. It tells Claude Code how to work on actual-mcp-server itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything actual-mcp-server configures →

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to agigante80/actual-mcp-server. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/agigante80/actual-mcp-server/main/.claude/commands/full-review.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/agigante80/actual-mcp-server

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for full-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/agigante80/actual-mcp-server/full-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/agigante80/actual-mcp-server/full-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/agigante80/actual-mcp-server/full-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/agigante80/actual-mcp-server/full-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for full-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/agigante80/actual-mcp-server/full-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/agigante80/actual-mcp-server/full-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 24 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 4,591 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 86% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00024 $0.04591
Opus 5 $0.00012 $0.02295
Sonnet 5 $0.00005 $0.00918
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00459

Measured 11d ago against content hash e06effbbfa73, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-10, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

full-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

86% identical to full-review — 324 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

.claude/commands/full-review.md · 546 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 546 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Comprehensive Code Review Orchestrator

CRITICAL BEHAVIORAL RULES

You MUST follow these rules exactly. Violating any of them is a failure.

  1. Execute phases in order. Do NOT skip ahead, reorder, or merge phases.
  2. Write output files. Each phase MUST produce its output file in .full-review/ before the next phase begins. Read from prior phase files -- do NOT rely on context window memory.
  3. Stop at checkpoints. When you reach a PHASE CHECKPOINT, you MUST stop and wait for explicit user approval before continuing. Use the AskUserQuestion tool with clear options.
  4. Halt on failure. If any step fails (agent error, missing files, access issues), STOP immediately. Present the error and ask the user how to proceed. Do NOT silently continue.
  5. Use only local agents. All subagent_type references use agents bundled in .claude/agents/. No cross-plugin dependencies.
  6. Never enter plan mode autonomously. Do NOT use EnterPlanMode. This command IS the plan -- execute it.

Pre-flight Checks

1. Check for existing session

Check if .full-review/state.json exists:

  • If it exists and status is "in_progress": Read it, display the current phase, and ask the user:

    Found an in-progress review session:
    Target: [target from state]
    Current phase: [phase from state]
    
    1. Resume from where we left off
    2. Start fresh (archives existing session)
    
  • If it exists and status is "complete": Ask whether to archive and start fresh.

2. Initialize state

Create .full-review/ directory and state.json:

{
  "target": "$ARGUMENTS",
  "status": "in_progress",
  "flags": {
    "security_focus": false,
    "performance_critical": false,
    "strict_mode": false
  },
  "current_step": 1,
  "current_phase": 1,
  "completed_steps": [],
  "files_created": [],
  "started_at": "ISO_TIMESTAMP",
  "last_updated": "ISO_TIMESTAMP"
}

Parse $ARGUMENTS for --security-focus, --performance-critical, --strict-mode flags.

Read the full file on GitHub · 546 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 11d ago First seen · 546 lines · 24 tokens per session scan A e06effbbfa73

Subscribe to this mod's changes

full-review is a command published in the GitHub repository agigante80/actual-mcp-server (54 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 24 tokens to every session and 4,591 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 86% identical to full-review, differing in 324 lines, and is treated as a copy.