Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to agigante80/Actual-sync. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/agigante80/Actual-sync/main/.claude/commands/ci-health.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/agigante80/Actual-syncWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/agigante80/actual-sync/ci-health)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/agigante80/actual-sync/ci-health"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/agigante80/actual-sync/ci-health/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/agigante80/actual-sync/ci-health"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/agigante80/actual-sync/ci-health.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.01832 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00916 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00366 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00183 |
Grade A, and why
ci-health scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 175 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
CI Health Monitor
Check all GitHub Actions workflows for failures, create P0 tickets, gate each ticket, and auto-fix safe failures.
Process
Execute these phases in order. Stop early if all workflows are passing.
Phase 1: Discover and assess workflows
Auto-discover all workflow files:
ls .github/workflows/*.yml .github/workflows/*.yaml 2>/dev/null
Determine each workflow's run branch by its trigger — this is the common failure of a
naive --branch development filter:
push/pull_requestworkflows (ci-cd.yml,codeql-analysis.yml): runs are attributed to the branch that triggered them — checkdevelopment(integration branch), and alsomainfor the release-path workflows (auto-release.ymlruns only onmain).schedule-triggered workflows (dependency-update.ymldaily cron, any CodeQL cron): GitHub attributes scheduled runs to the default branch (main), NOT to the branch the workflow checks out. A--branch developmentquery returns zero runs for these and silently reports them green — the exact failure this monitor exists to catch. Query these without--branch(take the latest run regardless of branch), or withmain.
Inspect each workflow's on: block to classify it, then query the latest run accordingly:
# push/PR workflow — filter by the branch it runs on:
gh run list --workflow <workflow-file> --branch <branch> --limit 1 --json databaseId,conclusion,createdAt,name,headBranch,event -q '.[0]'
# schedule-triggered workflow — do NOT filter by branch (runs are attributed to main):
gh run list --workflow <workflow-file> --limit 1 --json databaseId,conclusion,createdAt,name,headBranch,event -q '.[0]'
Include event and headBranch in the output so a misclassification is visible (a
schedule event showing headBranch: main confirms the no-filter path was needed).
For each failing run, get failed jobs and error logs:
gh run view <RUN_ID> --json jobs --jq '.jobs[] | select(.conclusion == "failure") | .name'
gh run view <RUN_ID> --log-failed 2>&1 | tail -150
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 175 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A a7b047196183
ci-health is a command published in the GitHub repository agigante80/Actual-sync (13 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 1,832 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-04.
Other commands, from other repositories
revenue
Apply the CLI runtime and safety contract before executing a command. Runtime --help is authoritative.
containers
Apply the CLI runtime and safety contract before executing a command. Runtime --help is authoritative.
access
Apply the CLI runtime and safety contract before executing a command. Runtime --help is authoritative.
notification-preferences
Apply the CLI runtime and safety contract before executing a command. Runtime --help is authoritative.
default-ai-review
Extract findings from the provided diff. Rank by severity. Produce a structured review. Emit one recommendation.
merge-conflict-analysis
You are analyzing merge conflicts for PR #${{ pr-number }}.